Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N2920

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2840

► remove Intel N2840

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.58 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2840 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2840 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Depending on the benchmark, the N2840 competes with older dual core CPUs like the Intel Core 2 Duo series. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2920
Intel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
2160 - 2410 MHz2160 - 2580 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz
112 KB112 KB224 KB
1 MB1 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 24 / 4
7.5 7.5 7.5
22 22 22
105 °C105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2920

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 66     avg: 68.3     median: 67 (2%)     max: 71 Points
min: 69     avg: 73.7     median: 76 (2%)     max: 76 Points
min: 116     avg: 119     median: 118.5 (3%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.6     median: 38 (17%)     max: 39 Points
min: 37     avg: 38.7     median: 38 (17%)     max: 41 Points
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (15%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (2%)     max: 0.92 Points
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (4%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (17%)     max: 0.45 Points
min: 0.43     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (18%)     max: 0.45 Points
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (15%)     max: 0.38 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (12%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 1328     avg: 1331     median: 1331 (14%)     max: 1334 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (11%)     max: 1049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (4%)     max: 2356 Points
2533 Points (4%)
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (6%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
3340 Points (4%)
min: 2585     avg: 3073     median: 3072.5 (4%)     max: 3560 Points
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (7%)     max: 5244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
1783 Points (17%)
min: 1471     avg: 1684     median: 1684 (16%)     max: 1897 Points
1453 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
962 seconds (11%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
32 seconds (6%)
WinRAR - Result
1728 KB/s (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
8.4 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
42.1 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
1510 Points (10%)
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (12%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.7 Seconds (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
95 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2035 Seconds (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
3606 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (5%)     max: 1052 points
min: 860     avg: 1028     median: 1072.5 (5%)     max: 1107 points
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (8%)     max: 1679 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (7%)     max: 11180 Points
min: 6624     avg: 6975     median: 6974.5 (4%)     max: 7325 Points
15979 Points (10%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
12854 Points (15%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
min: 644     avg: 652     median: 651.5 (2%)     max: 659 Points
1355 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1952 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
1688 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (19%)     max: 928 Points
957 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 4141.2     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (8%)     max: 6995.9 ms
min: 3842.8     avg: 4870     median: 4294.8 (7%)     max: 7094.1 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 319     avg: 433     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
min: 306.9     avg: 493     median: 535 (6%)     max: 663.6 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
741 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (14%)     max: 7397 Points
min: 4320     avg: 6695     median: 7486 (14%)     max: 8442 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2840 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 114%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)