, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2807

Intel Celeron N2820

► remove from comparison Intel N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2820 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2820 even competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2807
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock2170 - 2390 MHz1580 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt4.3 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), Wireless Display, SpeedstepIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2807

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N2820
9.8 pt (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
173 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
79 Points (10%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
143 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46     avg: 58     median: 58 (1%)     max: 70 Points
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
65 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 26     avg: 34.3     median: 37.9 (13%)     max: 39 Points
35 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.51     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
0.5 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.29     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.43 Points
0.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 900     avg: 1061     median: 1061 (9%)     max: 1222 Points
986 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1635     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (3%)     max: 2385 Points
2093 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3243 Points (3%)
3047 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1672 Points (10%)
1584 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1543 s (18%)
1763 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
48.5 s (10%)
57.4 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
675 Points (4%)
408 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
2891 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
1643 MIPS (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.8 fps (3%)
3.2 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (7%)
17 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N2820 +
0.4 fps (1%)
000.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.70.70.8Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N2820 +
9415 Seconds (66%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N2820 +
3.1 sec (67%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2820 +
1418 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36.5 s (8%)
38.8 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
81.4 s (3%)
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1696 s (8%)
1806 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
967 Points (3%)
976 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
5790 Points (4%)
6368 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
10079 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
12137 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 196     avg: 521     median: 520.5 (1%)     max: 845 Points
548 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2406 Points (19%)
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2077 Points (19%)
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2008 Points (4%)
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2304 Points (5%)
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2165 Points (6%)
1658 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1553 Points (3%)
1089 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
879 Points (18%)
688 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1677 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
950 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (13%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1761     avg: 1763     median: 1762.5 (2%)     max: 1764 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
4659 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 372.9     avg: 522     median: 521.8 (6%)     max: 670.6 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
41.1 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2820 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 84% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 09:47:35

#0 checking url part for id 4991 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.014s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 4991 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#25 got single benchmarks 4991 +0.011s ... 0.029s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0s ... 0.03s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#28 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.006s ... 0.036s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.043s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.019s ... 0.071s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.078s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.09s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#117 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.092s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#119 return log +0.004s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)