Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2806

Intel Celeron N2820

► remove from comparison Intel N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2820 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2820 even competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2806

► remove from comparison Intel N2806

The Intel Celeron N2806 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2806 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Therefore, the N2806 competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1200. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.5 watts (2.5 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2806
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock2170 - 2390 MHz1580 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt4.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), Wireless Display, SpeedstepIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), max. 4 GB DDR3L-1066, Execution Disable Bit, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2806

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N2820
9.2 pt (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N2820 +
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N2820 +
173 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
79 Points (10%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
143 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46     avg: 58     median: 58 (1%)     max: 70 Points
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
58 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 26     avg: 34.3     median: 37.9 (12%)     max: 39 Points
26 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.51     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
0.6 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 0.29     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.43 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 900     avg: 1061     median: 1061 (9%)     max: 1222 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1635     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (3%)     max: 2385 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2820 +
3243 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2820 +
1672 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2820 +
1543 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2820 +
48.5 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2820 +
675 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
2891 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
1643 MIPS (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2820 +
5.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2820 +
26.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N2820 +
0.4 fps (1%)
000.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.70.70.8Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N2820 +
9415 Seconds (66%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N2820 +
3.1 sec (67%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1418 Points (3%)
1195 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2820 +
36.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2820 +
81.4 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2820 +
1696 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
967 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
5790 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
10079 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
12137 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 196     avg: 521     median: 520.5 (1%)     max: 845 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
221 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
405 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
215 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
393 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (12%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1761     avg: 1763     median: 1762.5 (2%)     max: 1764 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1553 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
879 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1677 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
950 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2820 +
2406 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2820 +
2077 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2820 +
2008 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2820 +
2304 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2820 +
2165 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
4659 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 372.9     avg: 522     median: 522 (6%)     max: 671 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
29.1 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
41.1 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2820 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2806 → 86% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 01. 16:25:32

#0 checking url part for id 4991 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4987 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 4991 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#25 got single benchmarks 4991 +0.009s ... 0.027s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 4987 +0s ... 0.027s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#28 got single benchmarks 4987 +0.005s ... 0.032s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.039s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.014s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.067s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.068s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#96 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.077s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#98 return log +0.004s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)