Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2815 vs Intel Celeron N2805

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove from comparison Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2805

► remove from comparison Intel N2805

The Intel Celeron N2805 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.46 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2805 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2600. According to our benchmarks, the N2805 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2100. For very simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only very old and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (2.5 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2805
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 « 1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 « 1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz1460 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt4.3 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 667 MHz), Single-Channel DDR3L-1066
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 667 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C80 °C
SocketFCBGA1170
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
59 Points (0%)
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (0%)     max: 62 Points
44 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
31 Points (9%)
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (10%)     max: 34 Points
24 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
0.7 Points (1%)
96%
1 N2815 +
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
0.4 Points (9%)
97%
1 N2815 +
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
993 Points (6%)
1068 Points (6%)
min: 739     avg: 756     median: 756 (5%)     max: 773 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1474 Points (1%)
2038 Points (1%)
min: 1393     avg: 1430     median: 1430 (1%)     max: 1467 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
2672 Points (2%)
104%
1 N2815 +
2781 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
1318 Points (2%)
114%
1 N2815 +
1509 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1941 s (23%)
1818 s (21%)
2634 s (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
63.4 s (13%)
57.8 s (12%)
85.2 s (17%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
680 Points (1%)
594 Points (1%)
887 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.3 fps (1%)
4.5 fps (2%)
3.1 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
22.8 fps (5%)
24.1 fps (6%)
17.4 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2810 +
1043 Points (2%)
85%
1 N2805 +
885 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43 s (9%)
42.4 s (9%)
55.7 s (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
93.9 s (4%)
92.7 s (4%)
121.2 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1999 s (9%)
1965 s (9%)
2580 s (11%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2810 +
2038 Points (2%)
75%
1 N2805 +
1534 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
858 Points (2%)
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (2%)     max: 893 Points
min: 568     avg: 638     median: 637.5 (2%)     max: 707 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9157 Points (7%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (5%)     max: 9547 Points
min: 6672     avg: 6723     median: 6723 (5%)     max: 6774 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
710 Points (2%)
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
min: 512     avg: 521     median: 521 (1%)     max: 530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
969 Points (2%)
1017 Points (2%)
634 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1328 Points (2%)
1343 Points (2%)
1017 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
762 Points (15%)
781 Points (15%)
599 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2192 Points (18%)
2183 Points (18%)
1947 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2027 Points (18%)
1950 Points (18%)
1712 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1715 Points (3%)
1747 Points (3%)
1233 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1924 Points (4%)
1993 Points (4%)
1397 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1898 Points (5%)
1917 Points (5%)
1457 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 99% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2805 → 82% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 19:50:35

#0 checking url part for id 4577 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4578 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4577 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 4577 +0.012s ... 0.048s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4989 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#10 got single benchmarks 4989 +0.012s ... 0.063s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4578 +0.003s ... 0.066s

#12 got single benchmarks 4578 +0.008s ... 0.074s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.299s ... 0.374s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.374s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)