Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2830

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2830
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1580 - 2160 MHz2160 - 2410 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP4.3 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2830

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
65 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
35 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
986 Points (9%)
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (11%)     max: 1241 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2093 Points (3%)
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (3%)     max: 2356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3047 Points (3%)
3340 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1584 Points (10%)
1783 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2807 +
1763 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2807 +
57.4 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2807 +
408 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2807 +
3.2 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2807 +
17 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2807 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2807 +
38.8 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2807 +
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2807 +
1806 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
976 Points (3%)
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (4%)     max: 1052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
6368 Points (4%)
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (7%)     max: 11180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
548 Points (1%)
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1089 Points (2%)
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
688 Points (13%)
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (18%)     max: 928 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2807 +
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2807 +
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2807 +
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2807 +
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2807 +
1658 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4141     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (5%)     max: 6996 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 319     avg: 432.7     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (7%)     max: 7397 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 129% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 21:13:10

#0 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#28 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.019s ... 0.04s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.041s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#143 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.058s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#145 return log +0.004s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)