Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2815

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2815
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 « 1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 « 1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1580 - 2160 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP4.3 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2815

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
65 Points (1%)
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (1%)     max: 62 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
35 Points (11%)
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (10%)     max: 34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
986 Points (8%)
1068 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2093 Points (2%)
2038 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3047 Points (2%)
2781 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1584 Points (9%)
1509 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1763 s (21%)
1818 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
57.4 s (12%)
57.8 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
408 Points (2%)
594 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
3.2 fps (1%)
4.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
17 fps (4%)
24.1 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
38.8 s (8%)
42.4 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84.7 s (4%)
92.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1806 s (8%)
1965 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
976 Points (3%)
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (2%)     max: 893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
6368 Points (4%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
548 Points (1%)
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2815 +
1017 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1089 Points (2%)
1343 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
688 Points (13%)
781 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2249 Points (18%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1974 Points (18%)
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1391 Points (3%)
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1576 Points (3%)
1993 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1658 Points (4%)
1917 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 113% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 28. 17:00:46

#0 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4989 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0.002s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4989 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 4989 +0.009s ... 0.041s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.131s ... 0.172s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.194s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)