Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2815 vs Intel Celeron N2940

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2940

► remove Intel N2940

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.25 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2940 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2940 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2940 is similar to or slightly faster than the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts (4.5 W SDP - Scenario Design Power). Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2940
Intel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
1580 - 2160 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz1830 - 2250 MHz
112 KB112 KB224 KB
1 MB1 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 24 / 4
4.3 7.5 7.5
22 22 22
105 °C105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2815Intel Celeron N2940

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
65 Points (1%)
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55 (1%)     max: 62 Points
min: 89     avg: 110.5     median: 110 (3%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
35 Points (16%)
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32 (15%)     max: 34 Points
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35 (16%)     max: 36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
0.7 Points (2%)
1.6 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.3 Points (13%)
0.4 Points (18%)
0.4 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
986 Points (11%)
1068 Points (12%)
1150 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2093 Points (3%)
2038 Points (3%)
3958 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
3047 Points (4%)
2781 Points (4%)
5784 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
1584 Points (15%)
1509 Points (15%)
1663 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1762.8 seconds (21%)
1818.1 seconds (21%)
867.5 seconds (10%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
57.4 seconds (12%)
57.8 seconds (12%)
29.2 seconds (6%)
WinRAR - Result
408 KB/s (5%)
594 KB/s (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
3.2 fps (0%)
4.5 fps (0%)
9.4 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
17 fps (6%)
24.1 fps (9%)
46.9 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
2191 Points (15%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
38.8 Seconds (8%)
42.4 Seconds (9%)
27.5 Seconds (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84.7 Seconds (4%)
92.7 Seconds (4%)
61.2 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1805.6 Seconds (8%)
1965.4 Seconds (9%)
1566.1 Seconds (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
976 points (5%)
min: 850     avg: 871.5     median: 871 (4%)     max: 893 points
1635 points (8%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
6368 Points (4%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
17767 Points (11%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
548 Points (1%)
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
1257 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1017 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2249 Points (18%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
1974 Points (18%)
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
1391 Points (2%)
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
1576 Points (3%)
1993 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
1658 Points (4%)
1917 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
1089 Points (1%)
1343 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
688 Points (14%)
781 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 106%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2940 → 158%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)