Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2806 vs Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N2910

Intel Celeron N2806

► remove from comparison Intel N2806

The Intel Celeron N2806 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2806 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Therefore, the N2806 competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1200. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.5 watts (2.5 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2840

► remove from comparison Intel N2840

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.58 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2840 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2840 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Depending on the benchmark, the N2840 competes with older dual core CPUs like the Intel Core 2 Duo series. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2806Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2910
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 « 1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 « 2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 « 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1580 - 2000 MHz2160 - 2580 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 24 / 4
TDP4.5 Watt7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), max. 4 GB DDR3L-1066, Execution Disable Bit, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
58 Points (0%)
min: 69     avg: 73.7     median: 76 (0%)     max: 76 Points
97 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
26 Points (8%)
min: 37     avg: 38.7     median: 38 (11%)     max: 41 Points
27 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.6 Points (1%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.92 Points
1.1 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 0.43     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.45 Points
68%
1 N2910 +
0.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 1328     avg: 1331     median: 1331 (8%)     max: 1334 Points
63%
1 N2910 +
844 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2840 +
2533 Points (2%)
115%
1 N2910 +
2907 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 2585     avg: 3073     median: 3072.5 (2%)     max: 3560 Points
140%
1 N2910 +
4302 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 1471     avg: 1684     median: 1684 (2%)     max: 1897 Points
72%
1 N2910 +
1206 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1195 Points (3%)
1510 Points (3%)
1612 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2910 +
27 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2910 +
61 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 860     avg: 1028     median: 1072.5 (3%)     max: 1107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 6624     avg: 6975     median: 6974.5 (6%)     max: 7325 Points
188%
1 N2910 +
13106 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2840 +
12854 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 644     avg: 652     median: 651.5 (2%)     max: 659 Points
170%
1 N2910 +
1107 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2840 +
1688 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2840 +
957 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 3843     avg: 4870     median: 4295 (5%)     max: 7094 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 306.9     avg: 493     median: 535 (6%)     max: 664 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
741 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 4320     avg: 6695     median: 7486 (7%)     max: 8442 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2806 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2840 → 136% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 146% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 17:06:56

#0 checking url part for id 4987 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6008 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4987 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 4987 +0.007s ... 0.046s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6008 +0.004s ... 0.05s

#10 got single benchmarks 6008 +0.042s ... 0.092s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0.003s ... 0.095s

#12 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.006s ... 0.102s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.181s ... 0.283s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.283s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)