, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom N2800 vs Intel Atom N2600

Intel Atom N2800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2800 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to older Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2800 is comparable to an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

Intel Atom N2600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

Intel Atom N2800Intel Atom N2600
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Cedarview-MCedarview-M
Series: Atom Cedarview-M
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N28001.86 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N26001.6 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N28001.86 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N26001.6 GHz2 / 4
1860 MHz1600 MHz
1 MB1 MB
2 / 42 / 4
6,5 3.5
32 32
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$47 U.S.$47 U.S.
Intel Atom N2800Intel Atom N2600
FCBGA559
GMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
648 (6%)
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (5%)     max: 547
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1829 (3%)
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (2%)     max: 1562
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1719 s (20%)
2064 s (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
54.3 s (11%)
66 s (13%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2800 +
625 (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
3.7 fps (2%)
9.9 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
19.7 fps (6%)
9.8 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2800 +
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
965 Points (5%)
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (4%)     max: 829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
79.1 s (17%)
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
175 s (7%)
204 s (9%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
3884 s (17%)
4541 s (20%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2600 +
8139 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2600 +
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
2250 Points (14%)
1631 Points (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.3 Points (42%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
-1 Points (-0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
-1 Points (-0%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2800 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 102% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 11:13:50

#0 checking url part for id 2686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2684 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2686 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 2686 +0.009s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2684 +0s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 2684 +0.009s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.036s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#14 return log +0.004s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)