Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT

More pipelines and a faster clockspeed enable the X1800XT to have more performance than the X1800 and make it therefore good for elder DirectX 9 games. It is comparable with NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX.

Benchmark: notebookreview.com (engl)

ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 is part of the lower middle class. The performance can be compared with an elder X600, but technically it is a X1300, which is scarcely 100 Mhz higher clocked.

For not very demanding DirectX 9 games the card is sufficient.

Because of the AVIVO video technology the card can help the CPU decode MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 video formats.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 is higher clocked (nevertheless it has the same current consumption) version of the X1300 graphic card for laptops. It hardly can only be used for current games at the time of arrival (low resolution, low details, non-fluently).

As other X1000 cards the X1350 supports AVIVO video engine to accelerate MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 videos.

Aero Glass of Windows Vista should run fluently.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XTATI Mobility Radeon X1400ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
Mobility Radeon X1000 Series
Mobility Radeon X1900 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM58, R520M54M52
Pipelines16 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed550 MHz445 MHz470 MHz
Memory Speed650 MHz250 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
technology90 nm90 nm90 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2006 19.01.2006 18.09.2006
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.comati.amd.com
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB
Transistors105 Million105 Million
FeaturesAvivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nmAvivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nm
Information105 Millionen Transistoren

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13809     avg: 14405     median: 14404.5 (15%)     max: 15000 Points
12234 Points (13%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 4730     avg: 4900     median: 4900 (3%)     max: 5070 Points
4271 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 7300     avg: 7539     median: 7539 (8%)     max: 7778 Points
min: 2270     avg: 2284     median: 2284 (3%)     max: 2298 Points
2132 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
3DMark 06
min: 900     avg: 1064     median: 1064 (1%)     max: 1228 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
1088 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 → 30% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 → 28% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1400:
205  fps
med. 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1400:
35  fps
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1400:
12  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1400:
331.9  fps
ATI Mobility Radeon X1400lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.2053512
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo331.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1

1


1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 20. 04:38:44

#0 checking url part for id 15 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 30 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 43 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.174s ... 0.175s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.175s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.175s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15 +0.046s ... 0.221s

#9 got single benchmarks 15 +0.008s ... 0.228s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 30 +0.002s ... 0.23s

#11 got single benchmarks 30 +0.023s ... 0.253s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 43 +0.002s ... 0.255s

#13 got single benchmarks 43 +0.007s ... 0.263s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.263s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.116s ... 0.379s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.379s

#17 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.381s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.381s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.383s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.387s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.387s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.39s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)