ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT► remove
More pipelines and a faster clockspeed enable the X1800XT to have more performance than the X1800 and make it therefore good for elder DirectX 9 games. It is comparable with NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX.
Benchmark: notebookreview.com (engl)
ATI Mobility Radeon X1350► remove
ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 is higher clocked (nevertheless it has the same current consumption) version of the X1300 graphic card for laptops. It hardly can only be used for current games at the time of arrival (low resolution, low details, non-fluently).
As other X1000 cards the X1350 supports AVIVO video engine to accelerate MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 videos.
Aero Glass of Windows Vista should run fluently.
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700► remove
The graphic card ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 for notebooks is the successor of the ATI Mobility Radeon X1600. It achieves a higher performance with same current consumption due to strained Silicon. Due to additional pixel- and vertex-pipelines the performance is clearly above the X1600 and therefore sufficient for all games in 2006 with medium and high settings. The direct competitor ought to be NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 but the performance was compareable to the 7600.
Also a XT variant with a probably higher clock (codename M66-XT) was planned but did never arrive.
The Avivo video engine helps the cpu in decoding (HD) videos.
|ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT||ATI Mobility Radeon X1350||ATI Mobility Radeon X1700|
|Mobility Radeon X1000 Series|
|16 / 8||4 / 2||12 / 5|
|Core||550 MHz||470 MHz||475 MHz|
|Memory||650 MHz||350 MHz||400 MHz|
|Bus||256 Bit||128 Bit||128 Bit|
|DirectX||DirectX 9c, 3.0||DirectX 9c, 3.0||DirectX 9c, 3.0|
|Technology||90 nm||90 nm||90 nm|
|Max. Memory||256 MB||256 MB|
|Transistors||105 Million||157 Million|
|Features||Avivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nm||Avivo Video and Display Engine, Powerplay 6.0, PCI-E|
|90 nm, Windows Vista Premium ready|