Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1800

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 is a reduced version of the X1800XT. The performance was at the time of arrival still very good. The card was constructed for big laptops (DTR) as it had a high current consumption and heat emission. All games of 2006 were fully playable in high details with the X1800.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 is a middle class graphic card for notebooks of the X1000 series. Its performance can be compared with NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600. Technically, it can be compared with the desktop X1600 graphics chip + energy saving functions.

The Avivo video technology allows to accellerate the decoding of MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9, VC-1 and H.264 videos (including HD videos like Blu-ray).


http://www.nvidia.de/docs/CP/11086/PureVideo_Product_Comparison.pdf

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
Mobility Radeon X1000 Series
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM58M56
Pipelines12 / 6 Pixel- / Vertexshader12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed450 MHz450 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz470 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR/DDR2/GDDR3
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
technology90 nm90 nm
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.03.2006 01.02.2006
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.com
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Transistors157 Million
FeaturesAvivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0
Information157 Millionen Transistoren

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
19000 Points (20%)
min: 12200     avg: 16789     median: 16479 (17%)     max: 19704 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
10000 Points (5%)
min: 5529     avg: 6565     median: 6422 (3%)     max: 8000 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5600 Points (6%)
min: 3057     avg: 3708     median: 3688 (4%)     max: 4020 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
3DMark 06
3000 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
min: 1221     avg: 1821     median: 1836 (2%)     max: 2008 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
3DMark 06
2681 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 → 70% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1600:
193 239 324 ~ 252 fps
med. 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1600:
49 54 59 ~ 54 fps
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1600:
21 22 23 ~ 22 fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1600:
105.4 105.4 ~ 105 fps
med. 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1600:
101.4 101.4 ~ 101 fps
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1600:
54 54 ~ 54 fps
ultra 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1600:
30.7 30.7 ~ 31 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1600:
63.9 99.7 100.8 ~ 88 fps
med. 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1600:
62.9 97.3 98.9 ~ 86 fps
high 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1600:
51.7 59.1 59.2 ~ 57 fps
ultra 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1600:
37.7 39.7 40.3 ~ 39 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1600:
231.2 275.5 278.8 292.3 298.4 302.9 337.5 367.6 ~ 298 fps
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.2525422
Quake 41051015431
Doom 388865739
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo298
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1
1
2
1
2

1
2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 00:59:38

#0 checking url part for id 9 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 24 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.093s ... 0.094s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.094s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.094s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9 +0.023s ... 0.117s

#8 got single benchmarks 9 +0.009s ... 0.126s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 24 +0.001s ... 0.128s

#10 got single benchmarks 24 +0.057s ... 0.185s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.185s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.145s ... 0.33s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.33s

#14 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.334s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.334s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.336s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.011s ... 0.347s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.347s

#19 return log +0.066s ... 0.413s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)