Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

ATI Mobility Radeon X1450

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1450

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 dedicated graphic card for laptops has an improved relation of performance to current consumption compared with its predecessor ATI Mobility Radeon X1400. Both are part of the lower middle class. The performance can be compared with an elder X600, but technically it is a X1350.

Because of the AVIVO engine the card can support the CPU in decoding MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 und VC-1 videos.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 is higher clocked (nevertheless it has the same current consumption) version of the X1300 graphic card for laptops. It hardly can only be used for current games at the time of arrival (low resolution, low details, non-fluently).

As other X1000 cards the X1350 supports AVIVO video engine to accelerate MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 and VC-1 videos.

Aero Glass of Windows Vista should run fluently.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1450ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
Mobility Radeon X1000 Series
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM54M52
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed550 MHz470 MHz
Memory Speed450 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR1/DDR2/DDR3DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Transistors105 Million105 Million
technology90 nm90 nm
FeaturesAvivo Video und Display Engine. Powerplay 6.0, PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nmAvivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nm
Date of Announcement18.09.2006 18.09.2006
Information105 Millionen Transistoren, Strained Silcion für verbessertes Leistungs / Watt Verhältnis
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
9900 Points (10%)
12234 Points (13%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3400 Points (2%)
4271 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1520     avg: 1760     median: 1760 (2%)     max: 2000 Points
2132 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
3DMark 06
min: 970     avg: 1085     median: 1085 (1%)     max: 1200 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
1088 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 → 118% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 20:25:29

#0 checking url part for id 29 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 43 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1721499929 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:15:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 29 +0.018s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 29 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 43 +0s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 43 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.054s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.054s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.055s

#15 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)