ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:565

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v is a laptop graphics card based on the the old HD 4600 series. According to the specs it uses the same chip as the Mobility Radeon HD 4670. More information on games, benchmarks and specs can therefore be found on the above linked GPU page.

► remove from comparison

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565vVivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Series
Mobility Radeon HD 565v 320 @ 0.68 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 560v 320 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
ArchitectureTerascale 1
Pipelines320 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz600 / 800 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR3, DDR2
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0
Transistors514 Million
technology55 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement05.05.2010 12.09.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 1912     avg: 2310     median: 2255 (0%)     max: 2694 Points
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 38.2     avg: 48.8     median: 49.5 (74%)     max: 58 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 13:42:25

#0 checking url part for id 1904 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 565 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.151s ... 0.152s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.152s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.152s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1904 +0.042s ... 0.194s

#9 got single benchmarks 1904 +0s ... 0.194s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 565 +0.002s ... 0.196s

#11 got single benchmarks 565 +0s ... 0.197s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.002s ... 0.199s

#13 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.017s ... 0.216s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.216s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.027s ... 0.243s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.259s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.259s

#18 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.263s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.265s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)