ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:2400

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs vs Vivante GC800
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs vs Vivante GC800

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

This is a DirectX 10 graphic card from ATI and direct competitor to the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS graphic card for laptops. This would mean that the card is able to represent all modern DirectX 9 games in medium resolutions and without Antialiasing without motion interruptions. Demanding DirectX 10 games may only run in low settings and resolutions.

Due to the Avivo HD videoengine  the Chip accelerates HD Video like HD DVD, Blu-ray (Video Decoder for H.264/AVC, VC-1, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DivX Video Codecs). Furthermore PowerPlay 7.0 brings longer battery runtimes. Furthermore, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is certified for Windows Vista (for the Aero user interface).

Technically, the chip owns 40 stream processors which are able to manage vertex-, geometric or pixelshader operations. Therefore DirectX 10.0 and Shader Model 4.0 are supported. To be mentioned is also the 256 bit wide ringbus.

Compared to the Destkop HD 2400 Pro the Mobility version has a lower clock speed (450 versus 525 Mhz core speed) and is, therefore, a bit slower.

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400Vivante GC800
Series
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT 40 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 40 @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 500 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameM72
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256+ MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Transistors180 Million
technology65 nm28 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD Video, PowerPlay 7.0, Programmable Tesselation Unit (meant for Direct X 10.1), OpenGL 2.0
Date of Announcement14.05.2007 01.01.2012
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comwww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 8826     avg: 10379     median: 10205 (11%)     max: 12280 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3120     avg: 3424     median: 3425 (2%)     max: 3726 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2791     avg: 2872     median: 2833 (3%)     max: 3030 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
1215 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
min: 1367     avg: 1418     median: 1417.5 (2%)     max: 1468 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
1328 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1521     avg: 2210     median: 2210 (2%)     max: 2899 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
6  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
166 204 ~ 185 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
22 30 ~ 26 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
7 7 ~ 7 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
63.6  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
61.4  fps
high 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
42.8  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
26  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
185.9  fps

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400lowmed.highultraQHD4K
World in Conflict - Benchmark6
F.E.A.R.185267
Doom 363.661.442.826
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo185.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1
2

1
1
1

1
1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 14:19:20

#0 checking url part for id 87 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2400 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.111s ... 0.112s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.112s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.112s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 87 +0.036s ... 0.148s

#9 got single benchmarks 87 +0.022s ... 0.17s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2400 +0.002s ... 0.171s

#11 got single benchmarks 2400 +0s ... 0.172s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.002s ... 0.173s

#13 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.009s ... 0.182s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.182s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.135s ... 0.317s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.317s

#17 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.32s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.32s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.321s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.332s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.332s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.334s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)