ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:2400

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs vs Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs vs Intel Extreme Graphics 2

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

This is a DirectX 10 graphic card from ATI and direct competitor to the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS graphic card for laptops. This would mean that the card is able to represent all modern DirectX 9 games in medium resolutions and without Antialiasing without motion interruptions. Demanding DirectX 10 games may only run in low settings and resolutions.

Due to the Avivo HD videoengine  the Chip accelerates HD Video like HD DVD, Blu-ray (Video Decoder for H.264/AVC, VC-1, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DivX Video Codecs). Furthermore PowerPlay 7.0 brings longer battery runtimes. Furthermore, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is certified for Windows Vista (for the Aero user interface).

Technically, the chip owns 40 stream processors which are able to manage vertex-, geometric or pixelshader operations. Therefore DirectX 10.0 and Shader Model 4.0 are supported. To be mentioned is also the 256 bit wide ringbus.

Compared to the Destkop HD 2400 Pro the Mobility version has a lower clock speed (450 versus 525 Mhz core speed) and is, therefore, a bit slower.

Intel Extreme Graphics 2

► remove from comparison Intel Extreme Graphics 2

The Intel Extreme Graphics 2 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip with shared memory on the Intel 852 / 855 GM, GME, GMV chipsets for Centrino, Pentium 4 and Celeron based laptops. The 3D performance is very low and therefore the graphics card is not suited for 3D games. For example the 3D Mark 05 does not start due to the lack of pixel shader support. Furthermore, the card does not support Windows Aero in Vista and Windows 7.

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Series
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT 40 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 40 @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 500 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameM72Montara
ArchitectureRV6xxGen. 2
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz133 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256+ MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 8
Transistors180 Million
technology65 nm150 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD Video, PowerPlay 7.0, Programmable Tesselation Unit (meant for Direct X 10.1), OpenGL 2.0GDI und DirectX / DirectDraw mit Overlay Unterstützung, XFree86, XAA, Xv Unterstützung für Linux, Multi-Monitor Unterstützung, Dual Monitor Support, bis zu 96 MB vom Hauptspeicher (dynamisch)
Date of Announcement14.05.2007 03.12.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 8826     avg: 10379     median: 10205 (11%)     max: 12280 Points
min: 2214     avg: 2457     median: 2457 (3%)     max: 2700 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3120     avg: 3424     median: 3425 (2%)     max: 3726 Points
min: 115     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (0%)     max: 116 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2791     avg: 2872     median: 2833 (3%)     max: 3030 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
1215 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
min: 1367     avg: 1418     median: 1417.5 (2%)     max: 1468 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
3DMark 06
1328 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + Intel Extreme Graphics 2
3DMark 06
0 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1521     avg: 2210     median: 2210 (2%)     max: 2899 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Extreme Graphics 2 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
6  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
166 204 ~ 185 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
22 30 ~ 26 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
7 7 ~ 7 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
63.6  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
61.4  fps
high 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
42.8  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
26  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 2400:
185.9  fps

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400lowmed.highultraQHD4K
World in Conflict - Benchmark6
F.E.A.R.185267
Doom 363.661.442.826
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo185.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1
2

1
1
1

1
1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 03:23:19

#0 checking url part for id 87 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2400 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 54 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.146s ... 0.147s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.147s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.147s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 87 +0.04s ... 0.187s

#9 got single benchmarks 87 +0.026s ... 0.212s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2400 +0.001s ... 0.214s

#11 got single benchmarks 2400 +0s ... 0.214s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 54 +0.002s ... 0.216s

#13 got single benchmarks 54 +0.037s ... 0.253s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.253s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.016s ... 0.269s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.205s ... 0.474s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.478s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.478s

#19 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.483s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.483s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.485s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.494s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.494s

#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.496s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)