Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9550

ATI Mobility Radeon 9800

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon 9800

ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 is a slim X800 for AGP with energy saving functions and needs a lot of current. Therefore the performance of this card is correspondingly well, but it was rarely used (in a Dell 17" notebook). Nowadays (2008) the performance can be compared to middle class graphics cards.

The videoShader HD technology offers MPEG 1/2/4 decoding acceleration.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9700

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon 9700

ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 is the AGP pendant of the ATI Mobility Radeon X600. In these days it was the fastest available graphic card for notebooks and started the time of gaming noteboks. Despite its name, technically it is not related to the desktop graphic card 9700 (Pro), but with the 9600. Compared with the Mobility Radeon 9600 it is only higher clocked. The performance is like with X1400.

The version with only 32 MB memory can have a 64 bit memory interface. Then it is clearly slower!

ATI Mobility Radeon 9550

► remove from comparison

The ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 was a middle class graphics card for laptops. Technically it is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 featuring only a 64 Bit wide memory bus (instead of 128 Bit). Therefore, the performance was noticable slower.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon 9800ATI Mobility Radeon 9700ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Mobility Radeon 9x00 Series
Mobility Radeon 9800 8/4 cores @ 0.35 GHz256 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9700 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 275 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9600 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9550 4/2 cores @ 0.21 GHz64 Bit @ 183 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9800 8/4 cores @ 0.35 GHz256 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9700 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 275 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9600 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9550 4/2 cores @ 0.21 GHz64 Bit @ 183 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9800 8/4 cores @ 0.35 GHz256 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9700 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 275 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9600 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9550 4/2 cores @ 0.21 GHz64 Bit @ 183 MHz
CodenameM18M11M12
Pipelines8 / 4 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed350 MHz450 MHz210 MHz
Memory Speed300 MHz275 MHz183 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 / 64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2 / DDR3DDRDDR
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB128 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0
Transistors110 Million
technology130 nm130 nm130 nm
Features130nm low-k, PowerplaySmartshader 2.0, Smoothvision 2.1, Powerplay 4.0Powerplay 4.0, Hyper-Z II, SmartShader 2.0, 840 MT/s Füllrate, 130nm
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.07.2004 01.06.2004 01.06.2004
Information110 Mio Transistoren, 130nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.comwww.ati.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
17800 Points (18%)
10000 Points (10%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
6500 Points (3%)
min: 2779     avg: 2890     median: 2889.5 (2%)     max: 3000 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
2800 Points (3%)
1200 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
3DMark 06
860 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon 9700
280 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon 9700
3DMark 06
424 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 16. 12:47:42

#0 checking url part for id 14 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 31 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 64 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.11s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.11s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14 +0.035s ... 0.145s

#9 got single benchmarks 14 +0.005s ... 0.15s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 31 +0.002s ... 0.152s

#11 got single benchmarks 31 +0.015s ... 0.166s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 64 +0.002s ... 0.168s

#13 got single benchmarks 64 +0.005s ... 0.173s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.173s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.154s ... 0.326s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.326s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.328s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.33s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)