Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card with the Codename RS350. The chip supports DirectX 8.1 and is therefore not suited for Aero effects (Windows Vista upwards). Compared to the ATI Radeon 9100 IGP, the 9000 supports only single channel main memory.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card with the Codename RS350. The chip supports DirectX 8.1 and is therefore not suited for Aero effects (Windows Vista upwards). Compared to the ATI Radeon 9000 IGP, the 9100 supports dual channel main memory.

ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Mobilty Radeon 7000 IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based notebooks. It supports dual display and Powerplay. The integrated graphics core is based on the Mobility Radeon M6 (R100) core. Compared to the IGP 320M and 340M, the 7000 IGP is similar but classified a bit faster (performance class).

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGPATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGPATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
CodenameRC350RS350R100
Pipelines2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed300 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memorynonoyes
APIDirectX 8.1DirectX 8.1DirectX 7
Features
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
HyperZ, FSAA, 32Bit ZBuffer
Date of Announcement01.05.2003 23.06.2003 01.03.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comati.amd.comati.amd.com
Shader Speed300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
7450 Points (8%)
min: 1600     avg: 2680     median: 2680 (3%)     max: 3760 Points
min: 1450     avg: 1625     median: 1625 (2%)     max: 1800 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 500     avg: 707     median: 706.5 (0%)     max: 913 Points
min: 90     avg: 370     median: 370 (0%)     max: 650 Points
min: 70     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (0%)     max: 95 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP → 44% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP → 17% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 23:44:34

#0 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.097s ... 0.098s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.098s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.098s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0.032s ... 0.13s

#9 got single benchmarks 174 +0.007s ... 0.137s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0.001s ... 0.138s

#11 got single benchmarks 173 +0.006s ... 0.144s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.002s ... 0.146s

#13 got single benchmarks 171 +0.006s ... 0.152s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.163s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.163s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.165s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.167s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)