ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:7500

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

► remove from comparison

This was the first ATI graphic chip for laptops with hardware T&L and 2 render pipelines and competitor to the GeForce 2 Go / GeForce 4 Go.

The performance is sufficient for older games like e.g. Quake 3 Arena (100+ fps in 1024x768) but it is overruled by modern integrated graphic chips.

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

ATI Mobility Radeon 7500Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
CodenameRV200
Pipelines2 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 - unified
Core Speed280 MHz600 / 800 MHz
Memory Speed200 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 / 128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR
Max. Amount of Memory64 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 7DirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0
Power Consumption27 Watt
technology150 nm
FeaturesHardware T&L, AGP 4x, Video Immersion technology, Hydravision Software support, Powerplay II (minimal 66 MHz core clock, typical 0.5 Watt current consumption)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement28.08.2001 12.09.2013
Information150nm, AGP 4x
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com
Series
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 3500     avg: 3819     median: 3818.5 (4%)     max: 4137 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
155 Points (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 08:18:51

#0 checking url part for id 176 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7500 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.151s ... 0.152s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.152s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.152s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 176 +0.042s ... 0.194s

#9 got single benchmarks 176 +0.01s ... 0.204s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7500 +0.002s ... 0.206s

#11 got single benchmarks 7500 +0s ... 0.206s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.002s ... 0.208s

#13 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.016s ... 0.225s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.225s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.026s ... 0.251s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.268s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.268s

#18 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.272s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.274s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)