Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 is based on ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 for notebooks as probably the same chip was used. Only the Bios is different and allows the use of professional drivers (for CAD and 3D applications optimized). The standard Catalyst drivers can only be installed in a modded version. Therefore the V5200 becomes a X1600 (with the same performance). The professional drivers show a clearly reduced performance in games.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 is based on the ATI Mobility Radeon X700 middle class video card for notebooks and is designed especially for professional applications. Certified drivers für professional applications like AutoCAD, AutoDesk Inventor, Bentley Microstation, Catia, ICEM Surf, Solidworks, Discreet 3dsmax, Alias Maya, Alias Studio Tools, Avid SoftImage|XSI and Avid Express DV are the main difference.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200ATI Mobility FireGL V5000
Mobility FireGL V5xxx Series
Mobility FireGL V5250 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5250 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameM56GLM26GL
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader8 / 6 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed425 MHz350 MHz
Memory Speed475 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR/DDR2/GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB128 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0
Transistors157 Million
technology90 nm110 nm
FeaturesAvivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0110nm, PCIe, Powerplay 5.0 Stromspartechniken
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.02.2006 03.02.2005
Information157 Millionen TransistorenWindows und Linux Support,
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.ati.com/products/mobilityfire...http://www.ati.com/products/mobilityfire...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
16500 Points (17%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
5530 Points (3%)
6000 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3311     avg: 3629     median: 3316 (5%)     max: 4260 Points
2400 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
3DMark 06
min: 900     avg: 1204     median: 1203.5 (2%)     max: 1507 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 → 90% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 02:44:28

#0 checking url part for id 26 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 28 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.072s ... 0.072s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.075s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.075s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.075s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.075s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 26 +0.031s ... 0.106s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#12 got single benchmarks 26 +0.006s ... 0.112s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 28 +0s ... 0.113s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#17 got single benchmarks 28 +0.003s ... 0.117s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.118s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.119s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.121s

#28 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.121s

#29 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.122s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.09s ... 0.212s

#31 return log +0.002s ... 0.214s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)