Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 is based on ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 for notebooks as probably the same chip was used. Only the Bios is different and allows the use of professional drivers (for CAD and 3D applications optimized). The standard Catalyst drivers can only be installed in a modded version. Therefore the V5200 becomes a X1600 (with the same performance). The professional drivers show a clearly reduced performance in games.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 is based on the ATI Mobility Radeon X700 middle class video card for notebooks and is designed especially for professional applications. Certified drivers für professional applications like AutoCAD, AutoDesk Inventor, Bentley Microstation, Catia, ICEM Surf, Solidworks, Discreet 3dsmax, Alias Maya, Alias Studio Tools, Avid SoftImage|XSI and Avid Express DV are the main difference.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

The AMD ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 is a professional graphics adapter for notebooks. The core is based on the ATI Mobility Radeon X1700, which was a middle class graphics card at the time of offering. With modded Catalyst drivers, the V5250 can be modded to a X1700 with a better game performance but worse application performance.

The features of the card are identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon X1700.

 

show full text
ATI Mobility FireGL V5200ATI Mobility FireGL V5000ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
Mobility FireGL V5xxx Series
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameM56GLM26GLM56GL
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader8 / 6 Pixel- / Vertexshader12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed425 MHz350 MHz400 MHz
Memory Speed475 MHz350 MHz330 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR/DDR2/GDDR3GDDR3DDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB128 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Transistors157 Million157 Million
technology90 nm110 nm90 nm
FeaturesAvivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0110nm, PCIe, Powerplay 5.0 StromspartechnikenAvivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.02.2006 03.02.2005 01.01.2007
Information157 Millionen TransistorenWindows und Linux Support,157 Millionen Transistoren
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.comwww.ati.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
16500 Points (17%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
5530 Points (3%)
6000 Points (3%)
6484 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3311     avg: 3629     median: 3316 (4%)     max: 4260 Points
2400 Points (3%)
min: 3891     avg: 3896     median: 3895.5 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
3DMark 06
min: 900     avg: 1204     median: 1203.5 (2%)     max: 1507 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
1672 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 → 90% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 → 117% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 00:07:05

#0 checking url part for id 26 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 28 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 72 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.122s ... 0.123s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.123s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.123s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 26 +0.042s ... 0.164s

#9 got single benchmarks 26 +0.009s ... 0.174s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 28 +0.002s ... 0.176s

#11 got single benchmarks 28 +0.007s ... 0.183s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 72 +0.002s ... 0.184s

#13 got single benchmarks 72 +0.006s ... 0.19s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.19s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.101s ... 0.291s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.291s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.293s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.295s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)