Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 is based on the ATI Mobility Radeon X700 middle class video card for notebooks and is designed especially for professional applications. Certified drivers für professional applications like AutoCAD, AutoDesk Inventor, Bentley Microstation, Catia, ICEM Surf, Solidworks, Discreet 3dsmax, Alias Maya, Alias Studio Tools, Avid SoftImage|XSI and Avid Express DV are the main difference.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

The AMD ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 is a professional graphics adapter for notebooks. The core is based on the ATI Mobility Radeon X1700, which was a middle class graphics card at the time of offering. With modded Catalyst drivers, the V5250 can be modded to a X1700 with a better game performance but worse application performance.

The features of the card are identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon X1700.

 

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5200

ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 is based on ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 for notebooks as probably the same chip was used. Only the Bios is different and allows the use of professional drivers (for CAD and 3D applications optimized). The standard Catalyst drivers can only be installed in a modded version. Therefore the V5200 becomes a X1600 (with the same performance). The professional drivers show a clearly reduced performance in games.

show full text
ATI Mobility FireGL V5000ATI Mobility FireGL V5250ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
Mobility FireGL V5xxx Series
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5250 12/5 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 330 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5200 12/5 cores @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 475 MHz
Mobility FireGL V5000 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameM26GLM56GLM56GL
Pipelines8 / 6 Pixel- / Vertexshader12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed350 MHz400 MHz425 MHz
Memory Speed350 MHz330 MHz475 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4DDR/DDR2/GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
technology110 nm90 nm90 nm
Features110nm, PCIe, Powerplay 5.0 StromspartechnikenAvivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0Avivo Video and Display Engine. Die 12 Pixelshader werden durch 3 Kerne gesteuert, Powerplay 6.0
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement03.02.2005 01.01.2007 01.02.2006
InformationWindows und Linux Support,157 Millionen Transistoren157 Millionen Transistoren
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.comwww.ati.com
Transistors157 Million157 Million

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
16500 Points (17%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
6000 Points (3%)
6484 Points (3%)
5530 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
2400 Points (3%)
min: 3891     avg: 3896     median: 3895.5 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
min: 3311     avg: 3629     median: 3316 (4%)     max: 4260 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
3DMark 06
1672 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
min: 900     avg: 1204     median: 1203.5 (2%)     max: 1507 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 → 135% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 → 115% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 20. 03:16:21

#0 checking url part for id 28 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 72 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 26 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.222s ... 0.223s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.223s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.223s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 28 +0.06s ... 0.283s

#9 got single benchmarks 28 +0.008s ... 0.292s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 72 +0.002s ... 0.293s

#11 got single benchmarks 72 +0.007s ... 0.301s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 26 +0.002s ... 0.302s

#13 got single benchmarks 26 +0.013s ... 0.315s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.315s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.122s ... 0.437s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.437s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.439s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.442s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)