, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX vs SIS Mirage M661FX

SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX

► remove from comparison SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX

Onboard (shared memory) graphics card integrated in the SIS M672MX

chipset. Sometimes the graphics card for laptops is also called "SIS M672 integrated".

The graphics core is capable of DirectX 9 and therefore Windows Vista Premium certified. The chip is not usable for 3D games. Only Quake 3 Arena should run barely. World of Warcraft, UT 2004 (4 fps) or Aquanox (5fps) are not playable.

SIS Mirage M661FX

► remove from comparison

The SIS Mirage / SIS 661FX is an onboard graphics card in the SIS M661FX chipset. Because of bad drivers and a slow performance, the Mirage is not suited for 3D games. Even the very old Doom 3 and UT 2004 did not run fluently on a test sample (or even had severe graphical errors). Only Quake 3 Arena and the Aquamark (Aquanox 2 benchmark) ran with the lowest detail settings with acceptable framerates.

Due to missing pixel shaders (DirectX 9), the M661FX is not capable of displaying Aero effects in Windows Vista and Windows 7.

 

SIS Mirage 3+ 672MXSIS Mirage M661FX
ManufacturerSISSIS
Mirage Series
Mirage 3+ 672MX 2/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Mirage 3 671MX compare 2/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Mirage 2 M760 compare 4/1 cores @ 0.2 GHz
Mirage M661FX @ 0.13 GHz
Mirage 3+ 672MX 2/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Mirage 3 671MX compare 2/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Mirage 2 M760 compare 4/1 cores @ 0.2 GHz
Mirage M661FX @ 0.13 GHz
CodenameSISM672
Pipelines2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed250 MHz133 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 7
Featuresmax. 256 MB shared Memory
Date of Announcement01.01.2007 01.07.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.sis.com/products/sism672.htmhttp://www.sis.com/products/sism661fx.htm

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1395 Points (1%)
1300 Points (1%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 365     avg: 437     median: 425 (0%)     max: 520 Points
102 Points (0%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 275     avg: 315     median: 325 (0%)     max: 344 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX
3DMark 06
min: 140     avg: 145     median: 145 (0%)     max: 150 Points

Average Benchmarks SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks SIS Mirage M661FX → 59% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Mirage M661FX :
4  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 14:41:08

#0 checking url part for id 1045 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1045 +0.023s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 1045 +0.008s ... 0.071s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 168 +0.006s ... 0.078s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.08s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#14 Got 1 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.081s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.081s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.081s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.082s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.082s

#19 return log +0.048s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)