, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP12

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP4

The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.

The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.

Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8.

ARM Mali-T880 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP12

The ARM Mali-T880 MP12 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Samsung Exynos 8890. The chip is available since Q1/2016 (e.g. in some of the Galaxy S7 variants) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP12 version features 12 clusters/cores.

The MP12 version that is used in the Samsung Exynos 8890 is clocked with up to 650 MHz and is a bit slower than the Adreno 530 in the Snapdragon 820 SoC. However, it still belongs to the high-end graphics cards for ARM based SoCs.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4ARM Mali-T880 MP12
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)Midgard (4th Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (4rd-gen)Midgard (4rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified12 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz650 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
technology16 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
Date of Announcement26.11.2015 24.02.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...
CPU in Mali-T880 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9558 x 2500 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9508 x 2300 MHz? MHz900 MHz
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X10 x 2600 MHz? MHz875 MHz
min. - max.? MHz780 - 900 MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa8 x 2600 MHz650 MHz650 MHz

Benchmarks

min: 23431     avg: 29937     median: 33031 (5%)     max: 33348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
98665 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10624 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 636     avg: 1092     median: 1151.5 (7%)     max: 1242 Points
min: 2641     avg: 2644     median: 2644 (16%)     max: 2647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 575     avg: 1002     median: 1068.5 (2%)     max: 1133 Points
min: 3059     avg: 3065     median: 3065 (7%)     max: 3071 Points
min: 2060     avg: 2147     median: 2147 (22%)     max: 2234 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 360     avg: 816     median: 833 (3%)     max: 1108 Points
min: 2257     avg: 2326     median: 2325.5 (9%)     max: 2394 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP12
min: 80     avg: 82     median: 82 (1%)     max: 84 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP12
min: 51     avg: 52     median: 52 (2%)     max: 53 fps
min: 38     avg: 39     median: 39 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 25     avg: 26.3     median: 27 (7%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 3.2     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 4.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 3.8     avg: 5.1     median: 4 (2%)     max: 7.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.2 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 16610     avg: 16649     median: 16649 (38%)     max: 16688 Points
min: 19134     avg: 27168     median: 30097 (68%)     max: 32273 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 29659     avg: 29661     median: 29660.5 (66%)     max: 29662 Points
min: 40252     avg: 40672     median: 40671.5 (90%)     max: 41091 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6747     avg: 6960     median: 6988 (7%)     max: 7145 Points
min: 5864     avg: 6100     median: 6055 (6%)     max: 6382 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1344     avg: 1469     median: 1516 (3%)     max: 1548 Points
min: 2094     avg: 2132     median: 2131 (5%)     max: 2172 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4599 (100%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP12 → 189% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps 25 fps ~ 25 fps
med.
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 34 44 56 60 ~ 45 fps
124%
Mali-T880 MP12:
55 56 56 ~ 56 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP12:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 30 30 30 ~ 27 fps
111%
Mali-T880 MP12:
30 30 31 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-T880 MP12:
44  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-T880 MP12:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP12 → 112%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 124%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 14:41:21

#0 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7237 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:22:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.054s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.054s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7170 +0.024s ... 0.078s

#8 got single benchmarks 7170 +0.022s ... 0.1s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7237 +0s ... 0.1s

#10 got single benchmarks 7237 +0.009s ... 0.11s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.124s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.124s

#14 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.134s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.134s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.135s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.14s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.14s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)