Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T830 MP3 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP2

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP4

The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.

The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.

Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8.

ARM Mali-T830 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP3

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the Samsung Exynos 7880 in the beginning of 2017. The chip features three clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-T860 MP2 and therefore all typical Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 in the Exynos 7880 is manufactured in 14 nm and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-T880 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP2

The ARM Mali-T880 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P20 SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4ARM Mali-T830 MP3ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)Midgard (4th Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (4rd-gen)Midgard (4rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified2 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz600 (Boost) MHz900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1
technology16 nm16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
Date of Announcement26.11.2015 01.04.2016 26.11.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T880 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9558 x 2500 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9508 x 2300 MHz? MHz900 MHz
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X10 x 2600 MHz? MHz875 MHz
min. - max.? MHz780 - 900 MHz
CPU in Mali-T830 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78808 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P258 x 2600 MHz1000 MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67578 x 2300 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.900 - ? MHz? - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

13314 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
98665 Points (13%)
min: 6839     avg: 8665     median: 9269 (1%)     max: 9283 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10624 Points (1%)
min: 10498     avg: 11431     median: 11898 (1%)     max: 11898 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 636     avg: 1092     median: 1151.5 (5%)     max: 1242 Points
1180 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 575     avg: 1002     median: 1068.5 (2%)     max: 1133 Points
1074 Points (2%)
746 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 360     avg: 816     median: 833 (2%)     max: 1108 Points
643 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (0%)     max: 2.5 fps
1.5 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.2 fps
4.2 fps (0%)
5.2 fps (1%)
9.1 fps (0%)
15 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3
34 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 16610     avg: 16649     median: 16649 (38%)     max: 16688 Points
min: 9655     avg: 9936     median: 9935.5 (23%)     max: 10216 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 29659     avg: 29661     median: 29660.5 (66%)     max: 29662 Points
min: 18345     avg: 19359     median: 19359 (43%)     max: 20373 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6747     avg: 6960     median: 6988 (7%)     max: 7145 Points
min: 3868     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (4%)     max: 4072 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1344     avg: 1469     median: 1516 (3%)     max: 1548 Points
min: 1046     avg: 1086     median: 1085.5 (2%)     max: 1125 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4599 Points (100%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 86% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 73% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 25 ~ 25 fps
med.
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 34 44 56 60 ~ 45 fps
67%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
102%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 57 ~ 46 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 30 30 30 ~ 27 fps
107%
Mali-T830 MP3:
29  fps
111%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-T880 MP2:
52  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 91%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

ARM Mali-T880 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile2524
Shadow Fight 34242
Dead Trigger 245
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
Asphalt 9: Legends2929
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
2

1


2
2










ARM Mali-T830 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










ARM Mali-T880 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 246
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





3










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 10:37:08

#0 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7686 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.143s ... 0.144s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.144s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.144s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7170 +0.041s ... 0.185s

#9 got single benchmarks 7170 +0.038s ... 0.223s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7686 +0.002s ... 0.225s

#11 got single benchmarks 7686 +0.008s ... 0.233s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0.002s ... 0.235s

#13 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.041s ... 0.275s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.275s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.159s ... 0.434s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.434s

#17 Got 31 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.463s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.463s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.466s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.482s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.482s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.484s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)