, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-T880 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T830 MP2

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP4

The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.

The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.

Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4ARM Mali-T830 MP2
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (4rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
technology16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement26.11.2015 01.04.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPU in Mali-T880 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9558 x 2500 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9508 x 2300 MHz? MHz900 MHz
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X10 x 2600 MHz? MHz875 MHz
min. - max.? MHz780 - 900 MHz
CPU in Mali-T830 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6598 x 2360 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
min. - max.700 - ? MHz? - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
98665 Points (14%)
min: 4548     avg: 6301     median: 6960 (1%)     max: 7395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10624 Points (1%)
8002 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 636     avg: 1092     median: 1151.5 (7%)     max: 1242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 575     avg: 1002     median: 1068.5 (2%)     max: 1133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 360     avg: 816     median: 833 (3%)     max: 1108 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 3.2     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 4.7 fps
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (1%)     max: 1.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.5 fps
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 3.8     avg: 5.1     median: 4 (2%)     max: 7.5 fps
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.2 fps
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 2.8 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
57.8 fps (95%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 16610     avg: 16649     median: 16649 (38%)     max: 16688 Points
min: 8323     avg: 8545     median: 8542 (19%)     max: 8774 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 29659     avg: 29661     median: 29660.5 (66%)     max: 29662 Points
min: 15988     avg: 16554     median: 16613 (37%)     max: 17001 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6747     avg: 6960     median: 6988 (7%)     max: 7145 Points
min: 3565     avg: 3703     median: 3639 (4%)     max: 3967 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1344     avg: 1469     median: 1516 (3%)     max: 1548 Points
min: 1076     avg: 1184     median: 1160.5 (3%)     max: 1339 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4599 (100%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 51% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps 25 fps ~ 25 fps
med.
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps  fps
54%
Mali-T830 MP2:
13 fps  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-T830 MP2:
31 fps 31 fps ~ 31 fps
ultra
Mali-T830 MP2:
26 fps 31 fps 31 fps ~ 29 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 34 44 56 60 ~ 45 fps
89%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 30 30 30 30 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 35 49 51 52 56 57 58 ~ 40 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 29 fps 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 30 30 30 ~ 27 fps
89%
Mali-T830 MP2:
16 18 22 22 22 23 25 25 26 27 28 28 29 fps 30 ~ 24 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-T830 MP2:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-T830 MP2:
58  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 83%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 89%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 14:39:35

#0 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7310 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:22:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7170 +0.025s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 7170 +0.019s ... 0.091s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7310 +0s ... 0.092s

#10 got single benchmarks 7310 +0.027s ... 0.119s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.119s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.136s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.136s

#14 Got 70 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.155s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.155s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.155s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.162s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.162s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.165s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)