ARM Mali-T830 MP3 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP4
ARM Mali-T830 MP3 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the Samsung Exynos 7880 in the beginning of 2017. The chip features three clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3).
The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-T860 MP2 and therefore all typical Android games should run fluently.
The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 in the Exynos 7880 is manufactured in 14 nm and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.
The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8) . However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.
Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8 .
ARM Mali-T830 MP3 ARM Mali-T880 MP4 Manufacturer ARM ARM Mali-T800 Series Pipelines 2 - unified 4 - unified Core Speed 600 (Boost) MHz 900 (Boost) MHz Shared Memory no no DirectX DirectX 11 (FL 9_3) DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2) technology 16 nm 16 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3) OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2) Date of Announcement 01.04.2016 26.11.2015 Link to Manufacturer Page http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m... https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/... Codename Midgard (4th Generation) Architecture Midgard (4rd-gen)
Benchmarks 3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
13314 Points (2%)
min: 12649 avg: 18258 median: 17736.5 (3%) max: 22157 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
98665 Points (14%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
10624 Points (1%)
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
1180 Points (9%)
min: 636 avg: 1092 median: 1151.5 (9%) max: 1242 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
1074 Points (4%)
min: 575 avg: 1002 median: 1068.5 (4%) max: 1133 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
746 Points (9%)
min: 410 avg: 915 median: 950 (11%) max: 1157 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
643 Points (7%)
min: 360 avg: 816 median: 833 (9%) max: 1108 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080
34 fps (0%)
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4 min: 13 avg: 34.3 median: 39 (0%) max: 41 fps
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
33 fps (1%)
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
min: 14 avg: 32.4 median: 34 (1%) max: 44 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
15 fps (2%)
min: 5.9 avg: 16.3 median: 18 (3%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
15 fps (4%)
min: 6.5 avg: 15.4 median: 19 (5%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
5.2 fps (1%)
min: 4.8 avg: 6.3 median: 6.3 (1%) max: 7.3 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
5.2 fps (2%)
min: 3.1 avg: 5.8 median: 6.8 (3%) max: 7.4 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 2.4 avg: 3.2 median: 2.4 (2%) max: 4.7 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
min: 2.4 avg: 2.5 median: 2.5 (1%) max: 2.5 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 3.8 avg: 5.1 median: 4 (2%) max: 7.5 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
min: 6.9 avg: 7 median: 7 (1%) max: 7.2 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 16610 avg: 16649 median: 16649 (38%) max: 16688 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 29659 avg: 29661 median: 29660.5 (66%) max: 29662 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6747 avg: 6960 median: 6988 (22%) max: 7145 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1344 avg: 1469 median: 1516 (5%) max: 1548 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
4599 points (100%)
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100% n=11 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 118% n=11
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps [X] Huawei Mate 8 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 950 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
11 fps, max:
27 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! 25 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 0.7.0
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
2 fps, max:
26 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! ~ 25 fps
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 0.7.0
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
14 fps, max:
27 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! fps
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 1.12.0
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
33 fps, max:
51 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! fps
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 1.12.0
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
1 fps, max:
52 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30 fps
150%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 [X] Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
34 [X] Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
29 fps, max:
42 fps
44 56 60 [X] Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955 2.5GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
55 fps, max:
62 fps
~ 45 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 [X] Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
30 [X] Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
29 fps
93%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 [X] Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
23 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950 2.3GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
~ 27 fps
2013
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 1.0.1a
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! fps
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps [X] Land Rover Explore 1.0.1a
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X 2.6GHz
Mali-T880 MP4
min:
17 fps, max:
31 fps
Your browser does not support the canvas element! fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100% Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 114% For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.15
log 29. 03:53:54
#0 checking url part for id 7686 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:49:14 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s
#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.084s ... 0.112s
#8 skipping 201/647 for average % as not all devices got results +0.027s ... 0.139s
#9 skipping 201/601 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#10 skipping 365/1694 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#11 skipping 365/1696 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#12 skipping 365/1692 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#13 skipping 365/1690 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#14 skipping 267/765 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#15 skipping 267/764 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#16 skipping 200/597 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#17 skipping 200/598 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#18 skipping 119/431 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.139s
#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.139s
#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.139s
#21 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.157s
#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.157s
#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.159s
#24 return log +0.016s ... 0.175s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
