ARM Mali-T760 MP2 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP8

ARM Mali-T760 MP2

► remove ARM Mali-T760 MP2

The ARM Mali-T760 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the MediaTek MT6752 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP2 version offers 2 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (48 GFLOPS). Therefore, it only offers one third of the theoretical performance of the T760MP6 version. The gaming performance should be similar to the Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Therefore, it is situated in the middle class in 2014 and all games of that year should run fluently.

Due to the only 2 cores, the GPU is also suited for small tablets and smartphones.

ARM Mali-T760 MP8

► remove ARM Mali-T760 MP8

The ARM Mali-T760 MP8 is a fast mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa (Galaxy S6). The chip is available since Q1/2015 and is one of the fastest solutions of its class at the time of the introduction. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP8 version offers 8 clusters clocked at up to 772 MHz (302 GFLOPS). In most benchmarks, the GPU is able to beat the competing Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). Only a few tablet chips like Tegra K1/X1 or the GXA6850 (Apple A8X) are still somewhat faster. Overall, the Mali-T760 MP8 is the fastest smartphone GPU in early 2015 and will handle even the most demanding Android games fluently in high resolutions.

Despite its impressive performance, the Mali-T760 MP8 / Exynos 7420 has a very modest power consumption thanks to an advanced 14 nm FinFET process (Samsung LPE). Therefore, it can be used even in smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-T760 MP2ARM Mali-T760 MP8
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 700 - 772 MHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 650 MHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 700 - 772 MHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 600 MHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 650 MHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 600 MHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Cores2 - unified8 - unified
Core700 MHz700 - 772 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11.1DirectX 11
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Introduced01.10.2013 01.03.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
Technology14 nm
CPU in Mali-T760 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT87528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT67528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT87324 x 1500 MHz? MHz500 MHz
min. - max.? MHz500 - 700 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa8 x 2100 MHz700 MHz772 MHz

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 7352     avg: 8363     median: 8041 (1%)     max: 10019 Points
min: 23193     avg: 25970     median: 26964 (5%)     max: 28192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 4310     avg: 4909     median: 4794.5 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
min: 4310     avg: 4909.2     median: 4794.5 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 8765     avg: 9158     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
min: 8765     avg: 9157.7     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP8
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP8
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 4.4     median: 5 (1%)     max: 6.1 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.9     median: 22.5 (4%)     max: 25.5 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 4.9     avg: 8.1     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 13.3 fps
min: 11     avg: 14.4     median: 15 (4%)     max: 16 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 31.7     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (60%)     max: 41.48 fps
min: 59.36     avg: 59.9     median: 59.9 (99%)     max: 60.44 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4327     avg: 4514     median: 4513.5 (10%)     max: 4700 Points
min: 9252     avg: 22140     median: 26124 (59%)     max: 27059 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 10969     avg: 11318     median: 11318 (25%)     max: 11667 Points
min: 31743     avg: 35781     median: 36339.5 (81%)     max: 38701 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 53     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (80%)     max: 54.4 fps
min: 59.7     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (89%)     max: 60.5 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3808     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (12%)     max: 3955 Points
min: 4691     avg: 5019     median: 5054.5 (16%)     max: 5274 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1250     avg: 1275     median: 1274.5 (5%)     max: 1299 Points
min: 2227     avg: 2263     median: 2239.5 (8%)     max: 2345 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3843     avg: 4239     median: 4320 (94%)     max: 4489
min: 4489     avg: 4519     median: 4510 (98%)     max: 4566

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP2 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP8 → 235% n=14

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)