Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T624 vs ARM Mali-T604 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T628 MP4

ARM Mali-T624

► remove from comparison

The ARM Mali-T624 is an integrated graphics solution for ARM based processors. It can be built with 1 to 4 clusters/cores. The unified shader architecture supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 (Feature Level 9_3). 

ARM Mali-T604 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T604 MP4

The ARM Mali-T604 MP4 is an integrated graphics solution that launched in Samsung’s smartphone and tablet SoC Exynos 5250 with four cores. Besides OpenGL ES 3.0, the GPU also supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. The Mali-T604 can be scaled from 1 up to 4 clusters/cores depending on the requirements of the chip.

ARM Mali-T628 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T628 MP4

The ARM Mali-T628 MP4 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was first introduced in the Kirin 920 SoC at the end of 2014. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11. The Mali-T628 can be built with 1 to 8 clusters, the MP4 version offers four clusters that are clocked at about 600 MHz (77 GFLOPS). Displays of up to 2560x1600 are supported by the T628.

Depending on the benchmark, the 3D performance is slightly above the Adreno 320 (Snapdragon 600) or Adreno 405 (Snapdragon 610). At the time of launch in 2014 even high end games should run fluently on the Mali-T628MP4. 

The power consumption of the Mali-T628MP4 is relatively high for smartphones. Therefore, it is used in rather big smartphones and tablets.

show full text
ARM Mali-T624ARM Mali-T604 MP4ARM Mali-T628 MP4
Mali-T600 Series
Mali-T628 MP6 6 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T628 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T604 MP4 4 @ 0.53 GHz
Mali-T624 4
Mali-T628 MP6 6 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T628 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T604 MP4 4 @ 0.53 GHz
Mali-T624 4
Mali-T628 MP6 6 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T628 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T604 MP4 4 @ 0.53 GHz
Mali-T624 4
ArchitectureMidgard 2nd Gen
Pipelines4 - unified4 - unified4 - unified
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenCL 1.1, Renderscript, 32-2456kB L2 configureable, 1 - 4 coresOpenGL ES 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, 4xFSAA, 16xFSAA
Date of Announcement07.08.2013 12.11.2012 04.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CodenameMidgardMidgard (2nd Generation)
Core Speed533 MHz600 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-T628 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9208 x 1700 MHz? MHz600 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9358 x 2200 MHz? MHz600 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9308 x 2000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz600 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
9931 Points (1%)
min: 8743     avg: 11771     median: 11984 (1%)     max: 14522 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4427 Points (1%)
min: 5319     avg: 7193     median: 7040 (1%)     max: 8607 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9514 Points (1%)
min: 9891     avg: 10429     median: 10515 (1%)     max: 10881 Points
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
3.9 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
3.6 fps (0%)
min: 5.5     avg: 6.9     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T624
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
14.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T604 MP4
12.4 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T628 MP4
min: 10     avg: 12.9     median: 12 (0%)     max: 17 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
2881 Points (100%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
3764 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5303 Points (55%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
59.3 fps (98%)
26 fps (43%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
4944 Points (11%)
min: 5367     avg: 6039     median: 6038.5 (14%)     max: 6710 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
12170 Points (27%)
min: 15858     avg: 18011     median: 18011 (40%)     max: 20164 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
59.1 fps (88%)
55.2 fps (82%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
3692 Points (4%)
min: 1549     avg: 2512     median: 2512 (3%)     max: 3475 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1067 Points (2%)
min: 1013     avg: 1216     median: 1215.5 (2%)     max: 1418 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4428 Points (96%)
2577 Points (56%)
min: 3804     avg: 4224     median: 4310 (94%)     max: 4363 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T624 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T604 MP4 → 73% n=2

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T628 MP4 → 91% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-T628 MP4:
30  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
Mali-T628 MP4:
27  fps
ARM Mali-T628 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne27
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps





1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 20. 01:19:54

#0 checking url part for id 5484 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3560 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6183 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.164s ... 0.165s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.165s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.165s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5484 +0.047s ... 0.212s

#9 got single benchmarks 5484 +0.01s ... 0.222s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3560 +0.002s ... 0.224s

#11 got single benchmarks 3560 +0.014s ... 0.238s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6183 +0.002s ... 0.24s

#13 got single benchmarks 6183 +0.019s ... 0.26s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.26s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.327s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.327s

#17 Got 2 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.335s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.335s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.336s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.341s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.341s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.343s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)