Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP24 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP5

ARM Mali-G78 MP24

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP24

The ARM Mali-G78MP24 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (e.g. Huawei Mate 40). It integrates all of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G57 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP5

The ARM Mali-G57 MP5 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 and uses 5 clusters (hence the MC5/MP5 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP5 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 / Remi 10x) is comparable to the Adreno 540 and also the ARM Mali-G57 MP6 (most likely due to higher clock rates).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrost
Pipelines24 - unified5 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G78 MP24GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 90008 x 2050 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
123332 Points (14%)
38974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11895 Points (52%)
5469 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
17612 Points (39%)
5991 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9643 Points (48%)
4497 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12146 Points (36%)
4798 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6923 Points (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
32 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
29 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
52 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
71 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP5
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
115 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
42 fps (0%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 40% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP24:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP24:
40  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
30  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-G78 MP24lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile40
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
1









ARM Mali-G57 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends30
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1

1


2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 16:07:19

#0 checking url part for id 10564 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10480 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.102s ... 0.103s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.103s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.103s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10564 +0.027s ... 0.13s

#8 got single benchmarks 10564 +0.009s ... 0.139s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10480 +0.002s ... 0.141s

#10 got single benchmarks 10480 +0.009s ... 0.15s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.15s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.21s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.21s

#14 Got 7 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.214s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.214s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.216s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.226s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.226s

#19 return log +0.06s ... 0.285s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)