Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP22 vs ARM Mali-G76 MP12

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G78 MP22ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrost
Pipelines24 - unified10 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 31.08.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-...https://developer.arm.com/products/graph...
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (8%)     max: 72022 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11598 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
16653 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9630 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12079 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6399 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1805 Points (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
61 fps (2%)
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
61 fps (17%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
154 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
30 fps (18%)
min: 16     avg: 20.3     median: 16.5 (10%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
31 fps (10%)
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (5%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
44 fps (19%)
min: 16     avg: 25.8     median: 26 (11%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76 fps (10%)
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (6%)     max: 48 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
41 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
64 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
74.4 fps (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7354 Points (7%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
6315 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 57% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
58  fps
med.
Mali-G76 MP12:
39  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
130%
Mali-G76 MP12:
38 39 40 40 ~ 39 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 130%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 130%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 02. 09:12:10

#0 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:16:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.337s ... 0.338s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.338s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.338s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0.023s ... 0.361s

#8 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.006s ... 0.368s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.001s ... 0.369s

#10 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.014s ... 0.383s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.383s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.449s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.449s

#14 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.458s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.458s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.462s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.479s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.479s

#19 return log +0.043s ... 0.522s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)