Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP22 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP5

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

show full text
ARM Mali-G78 MP22ARM Mali-G57 MP4ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrostValhall
Pipelines24 - unified4 - unified5 - unified
Shared Memorynonono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm7 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 03.07.2020 14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
UNISOC T8208 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7608 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - 850 MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
37882 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11598 Points (50%)
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
16653 Points (37%)
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9630 Points (48%)
min: 3410     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (17%)     max: 3557 Points
min: 4897     avg: 4978     median: 5002 (25%)     max: 5043 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12079 Points (36%)
min: 3353     avg: 3361     median: 3360.5 (10%)     max: 3368 Points
min: 5118     avg: 5208     median: 5233 (16%)     max: 5323 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6399 Points (3%)
min: 1620     avg: 1631     median: 1630.5 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
min: 2796     avg: 2911     median: 2955 (1%)     max: 2987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1805 Points (2%)
min: 799     avg: 1366     median: 832 (1%)     max: 3001 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
31 fps (6%)
8.2 fps (1%)
min: 13     avg: 13.4     median: 13 (2%)     max: 14 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76 fps (6%)
22 fps (2%)
min: 34     avg: 34.4     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
64 fps (7%)
20 fps (2%)
min: 30     avg: 30.8     median: 31 (3%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
112 fps (2%)
min: 30     avg: 33.8     median: 34 (1%)     max: 37 fps
min: 52     avg: 52.2     median: 52 (1%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
154 fps (9%)
min: 47     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (3%)     max: 55 fps
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (5%)     max: 80 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP5
min: 118     avg: 119     median: 119 (1%)     max: 120 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (13%)     max: 106975 Points
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (18%)     max: 149350 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
74.4 fps (0%)
34.2 fps (0%)
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (0%)     max: 41.92 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971     avg: 3046     median: 3069 (1%)     max: 3098 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039     avg: 3083     median: 3102 (1%)     max: 3109 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24573 Points (25%)
12517 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
22448 Points (39%)
3997 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (5%)
min: 4.32     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.04 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 32% n=12

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 48% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G68 MP5:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
50 56 58 ~ 55 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
43 50 ~ 47 fps
ultra
Mali-G68 MP5:
36 38 39.7 ~ 38 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
107%
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 107%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 107%

ARM Mali-G68 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554738
PUBG Mobile303032
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2


1
1

1







ARM Mali-G78 MP22lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile30
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
2









ARM Mali-G57 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 09:43:23

#0 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11584 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.189s ... 0.191s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.191s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.191s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0.044s ... 0.235s

#9 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.008s ... 0.243s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.002s ... 0.244s

#11 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.019s ... 0.263s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.002s ... 0.266s

#13 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.016s ... 0.282s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.282s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.164s ... 0.446s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.446s

#17 Got 27 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.467s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.467s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.47s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.485s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.485s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.487s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)