ARM Mali-G76 MP16 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs ARM Mali-G77 MP9
ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G76 MP16 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Kirin 990 5G and according to Huawei should be about 6% faster and 20% more efficient than a Adreno 640 in a Snapdragon 855. It integrates 16 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620 .
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).
The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 60860 avg: 71882 median: 70607.5 (8%) max: 82652 Points
37882 Points (4%)
60765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4213 avg: 5790 median: 5785 (31%) max: 7286 Points
min: 4259 avg: 4459 median: 4459 (24%) max: 4659 Points
min: 8041 avg: 8545 median: 8411 (45%) max: 9182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4064 avg: 6079 median: 6119.5 (14%) max: 7970 Points
min: 4497 avg: 4609 median: 4609 (11%) max: 4721 Points
min: 9823 avg: 11069 median: 11615 (27%) max: 11770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4422 avg: 5738 median: 6261 (39%) max: 6508 Points
min: 3410 avg: 3484 median: 3483.5 (22%) max: 3557 Points
min: 6890 avg: 7226 median: 7256 (45%) max: 7531 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4356 avg: 6136 median: 6631.5 (3%) max: 6771 Points
min: 3353 avg: 3361 median: 3360.5 (2%) max: 3368 Points
min: 7501 avg: 8152 median: 8353 (4%) max: 8601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3310 avg: 3313 median: 3312.5 (2%) max: 3315 Points
min: 1620 avg: 1631 median: 1630.5 (1%) max: 1641 Points
min: 4194 avg: 4322 median: 4273.5 (2%) max: 4548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1205 avg: 1247 median: 1243 (1%) max: 1295 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 58 avg: 59.7 median: 60 (2%) max: 60 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
min: 59 avg: 92 median: 112 (3%) max: 116 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 135 avg: 146.8 median: 151.5 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
min: 73 avg: 82.3 median: 84 (1%) max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
min: 177 avg: 184.8 median: 184 (1%) max: 200 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 44 avg: 52.7 median: 53 (15%) max: 60 fps
46 fps (13%)
min: 57 avg: 78.2 median: 75 (21%) max: 106 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 64 avg: 97.7 median: 103 (6%) max: 118 fps
min: 47 avg: 51.3 median: 51.5 (3%) max: 55 fps
min: 110 avg: 121 median: 122 (7%) max: 129 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 13 avg: 26.8 median: 26 (5%) max: 46 fps
min: 12 avg: 12.5 median: 12.5 (3%) max: 13 fps
min: 19 avg: 28.4 median: 31 (6%) max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 17 avg: 28.5 median: 19 (3%) max: 68 fps
8.2 fps (1%)
min: 9.7 avg: 18.3 median: 21 (4%) max: 21 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 17 avg: 39.2 median: 40 (6%) max: 60 fps
min: 20 avg: 20.5 median: 20.5 (3%) max: 21 fps
min: 29 avg: 43.2 median: 47 (6%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41 avg: 67.3 median: 49.5 (4%) max: 165 fps
22 fps (2%)
min: 49 avg: 53.2 median: 54 (4%) max: 56 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 17 avg: 28.8 median: 32.5 (1%) max: 36 fps
17 fps (0%)
min: 26 avg: 37.2 median: 41 (1%) max: 44 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 32 avg: 40.2 median: 42 (0%) max: 44 fps
20 fps (0%)
min: 39 avg: 46 median: 47 (0%) max: 50 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
9 fps (4%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378 avg: 101623 median: 105516 (13%) max: 106975 Points
min: 194863 avg: 214616 median: 220176 (27%) max: 228699 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 52.6 avg: 53.4 median: 53.3 (2%) max: 54.4 fps
34.2 fps (1%)
min: 44.45 avg: 58 median: 58.1 (2%) max: 71.3 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
14976 Points (15%)
24573 Points (25%)
min: 24859 avg: 30649 median: 30649 (31%) max: 36439 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
5015 Points (9%)
22448 Points (39%)
min: 24901 avg: 27544 median: 27543.5 (48%) max: 30186 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 4.8 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP16 → 100% n=19 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 85% n=19 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 154% n=19
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Mali-G57 MP4:
61 [X] Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 1.56.9
MediaTek Dimensity 800 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP4
min:
60 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi 11T 1.61.6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
59.3 [X] OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
57 fps, P1:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
119 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60 [X] Huawei P40 0.17.0
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
98%
Mali-G77 MP9:
58.9 [X] OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
55 fps, P1:
56.48 fps, max:
60 fps
59 60 ~ 59 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
40 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 [X] Huawei P40 0.17.0
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 40 [X] Huawei Mate 30 Pro PUBG Mobile (0.15.0)
HiSilicon Kirin 990 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
30 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P40 Pro 0.17.0
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
32 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei Mate Xs 0.17.0
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
35 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 37 fps
97%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 [X] Xiaomi 11T 1.6.0
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 39.9 [X] OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
39 fps, P1:
39 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 ~ 36 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60 [X] Huawei P40 Pro 6.9.0.503
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
60 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 [X] Huawei P40 1.34.1.10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 [X] Huawei P40 5.0.1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60 [X] Huawei Mate 30 Pro Dead Trigger 2 (1.6.3)
HiSilicon Kirin 990 0GHz
Mali-G76 MP16
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G57 MP4:
30 [X] Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2.6.3a
MediaTek Dimensity 800 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP4
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
187%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 [X] Xiaomi 11T 3.1.2a
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 56 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP16 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 77% Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 116% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 27. 22:32:39
#0 checking url part for id 9950 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:23:52 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.134s ... 0.135s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.135s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.135s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9950 +0.043s ... 0.178s
#9 got single benchmarks 9950 +0.022s ... 0.2s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.001s ... 0.202s
#11 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.013s ... 0.215s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0.001s ... 0.216s
#13 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.031s ... 0.247s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.247s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.148s ... 0.395s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.395s
#17 Got 48 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.41s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.41s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.414s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.02s ... 0.434s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.434s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.436s
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)