ARM Mali-G72 MP3 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G72 MP12
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2018 in the MediaTek Helio P60 and uses 3 clusters (hence the MP3 name).
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 Qualcomm Adreno 680 ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Bifrost Pipelines 3 - unified 12 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz 850 MHz Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 7 nm 16 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 06.12.2018 18.10.2017 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Power Consumption 7 Watt
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 15971 avg: 21202 median: 20999.5 (2%) max: 25625 Points
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1309 avg: 1756 median: 1761.5 (8%) max: 2074 Points
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1159 avg: 1635 median: 1605.5 (4%) max: 2021 Points
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 853 avg: 1293 median: 1272 (6%) max: 1659 Points
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 721 avg: 1146 median: 1104 (3%) max: 1533 Points
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635 avg: 668 median: 652.5 (0%) max: 713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 183 avg: 186.4 median: 185 (0%) max: 192 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650 avg: 1847 median: 1847 (3%) max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593 avg: 1936 median: 1935.5 (2%) max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.1 avg: 3.1 median: 2.9 (1%) max: 4.9 fps
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.1 avg: 8.4 median: 8.3 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.8 avg: 8.2 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 11 fps
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.9 avg: 13.1 median: 13 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 21 median: 20 (1%) max: 31 fps
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 28 avg: 37.8 median: 38 (0%) max: 48 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 25971 avg: 36762 median: 36761.5 (5%) max: 47552 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.9 fps (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 5364 avg: 8946 median: 7445.5 (7%) max: 22800 Points
8180 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1538 avg: 4645 median: 2242.5 (4%) max: 21615 Points
3761 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.48 avg: 3.7 median: 3.7 (1%) max: 4 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 369% n=1 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 311% n=1
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
43 53 57 ~ 51 fps
84%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
117%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
146%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
80%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
86%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
107%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
107%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
115%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 105% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 51 PUBG Mobile 38 28 29 World of Tanks Blitz 60 41 Arena of Valor 54 58 Shadow Fight 3 56 58 Asphalt 9: Legends 28 26 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 3 1 1 2 3 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 23. 22:46:21
#0 checking url part for id 8804 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.102s ... 0.103s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.103s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.103s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8804 +0.035s ... 0.138s
#9 got single benchmarks 8804 +0.106s ... 0.243s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.002s ... 0.245s
#11 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.011s ... 0.256s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.001s ... 0.257s
#13 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.017s ... 0.275s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.275s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.111s ... 0.386s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.386s
#17 Got 100 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.412s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.412s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.417s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.02s ... 0.436s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.436s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.438s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)