ARM Mali-G71 MP2 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP8 vs ARM Mali-G76 MP16

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

► remove ARM Mali-G71 MP2

The ARM Mali-G71 MP2 is an integrated entry-level graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip Mediatek Helio P23 with 700 or 770 MHz clock speed. Supports OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1 and RenderScript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

► remove ARM Mali-G71 MP8

The ARM Mali-G71 MP8 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 in November 2016 for the first time. Based on initial benchmarks, the GPU performance is slightly better compared to the Adreno 530 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821. It is therefore one of the most powerful graphics units for (Android) devices in the end of 2016.

ARM Mali-G76 MP16

► remove ARM Mali-G76 MP16

The ARM Mali-G76 MP16 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Kirin 990 5G and according to Huawei should be about 6% faster and 20% more efficient than a Adreno 640 in a Snapdragon 855. It integrates 16 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP2ARM Mali-G71 MP8ARM Mali-G76 MP16
ManufacturerARMARMARM
Mali-G Series
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 720 MHz
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 800 MHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 770 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 650 MHz
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 720 MHz
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 800 MHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 770 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 650 MHz
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 720 MHz
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 800 MHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 770 (Boost) MHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 850 MHz
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 650 MHz
CodenameMimirMimir
ArchitectureBifrostBifrostBifrost
2 - 8 - 16 -
Core770 (Boost) MHz900 (Boost) MHz
nonono
Technology16 nm16 nm7 nm
Introduced03.06.2016 03.06.2016 31.08.2018
Manufacturerhttps://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...https://developer.arm.com/products/graph...
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78858 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 79048 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T8 x 2300 MHz770 MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 770 MHz? - ? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 1152     avg: 11551.9     median: 11269 (2%)     max: 15567 Points
min: 32243     avg: 35200.7     median: 35210 (7%)     max: 38979 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
13392 Points (2%)
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 629     avg: 776     median: 739 (5%)     max: 1097 Points
min: 1900     avg: 2396.4     median: 2399 (18%)     max: 2894 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 564     avg: 676.8     median: 639 (2%)     max: 971 Points
min: 1848     avg: 2494.4     median: 2463 (9%)     max: 3241 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 431     avg: 523.5     median: 503 (7%)     max: 737 Points
min: 1600     avg: 1993.6     median: 2011 (29%)     max: 2368 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 371     avg: 439.7     median: 417 (5%)     max: 629 Points
min: 1511     avg: 1956.8     median: 1967 (23%)     max: 2380 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 7     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 16 fps
min: 19     avg: 33.3     median: 32 (6%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 6     avg: 14.9     median: 12 (3%)     max: 27 fps
min: 20     avg: 27.9     median: 27 (7%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 1     avg: 3.4     median: 3 (2%)     max: 6 fps
min: 8     avg: 9.4     median: 9 (6%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
min: 1     avg: 1.6     median: 1 (1%)     max: 2 fps
min: 4     avg: 5.9     median: 5 (4%)     max: 7 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 3     avg: 5.7     median: 5 (3%)     max: 10 fps
min: 11     avg: 13.5     median: 13 (7%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
min: 3     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (3%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 2     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 6 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (4%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 2     avg: 5.9     median: 4 (2%)     max: 12 fps
min: 9     avg: 12     median: 10 (6%)     max: 16 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 31104     avg: 34536     median: 34536 (78%)     max: 37968 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 42176     avg: 42979     median: 42979 (96%)     max: 43782 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2471     avg: 4581.5     median: 4550 (22%)     max: 6755 Points
min: 10073     avg: 10164     median: 10164 (48%)     max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1205     avg: 1444     median: 1451 (23%)     max: 1668 Points
min: 1909     avg: 1915     median: 1915 (30%)     max: 1921 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 100%

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 289%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
30 fps  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
26 fps 29 fps 30 fps ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
21 fps 29 fps 29 fps 30 fps ~ 27 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
98%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 fps 60 fps ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
30 fps 60 fps 60 fps ~ 50 fps
118%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 fps 60 fps ~ 59 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Mali-G71 MP8:
»
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 fps  fps
73%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 fps 58 fps ~ 44 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 fps  fps
82%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 fps 58 fps 60 fps ~ 49 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Mali-G71 MP8:
»
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 fps 60 fps ~ 59 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
47 fps  fps
126%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 fps 60 fps 60 fps ~ 59 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Mali-G71 MP8:
»
GTA V

GTA V

2015
4K 3840x2160
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
50.8  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
46 48 54 60 fps ~ 52 fps
92%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 45 56 60 ~ 48 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Mali-G71 MP8:
»
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 30 ~ 27 fps
111%
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Mali-G71 MP8:
»

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
28 fps 29 fps 30 fps ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
24 fps 25 fps 28 fps 29 fps 29 fps ~ 27 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
59  fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
»

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 100%

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)