Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP6 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP4

ARM Mali-G57 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP6

The ARM Mali-G57 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 820 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 820 / Huawei P40 Lite) is comparable to the Adreno 620 (e.g. Oppo Find X2) and ARM Mali-G72 MP18 (Note10 Lite).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP20

The ARM Mali-G71 MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was e.g. used in smartphone chip Samsung Exynos 9 8895. It features 20 clusters and is manufactured in 10nm FinFET (in the Exynos 8895). The performance is in the high-end class and therefore all current Android games should run fluently on the chip.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G57 MP6ARM Mali-G71 MP20ARM Mali-G57 MP4
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallMimirValhall
ArchitectureBifrostBifrostBifrost
Pipelines6 - unified8 - unified4 - unified
Shared Memorynonono
technology7 nm16 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020 29.03.2017 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Mali-G57 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8208 x 1840 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 820e8 x 1840 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
UNISOC T8208 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7608 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
57067 Points (6%)
min: 33077     avg: 35410     median: 36347 (4%)     max: 36807 Points
37882 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5853 Points (25%)
min: 3222     avg: 3555     median: 3426 (15%)     max: 4016 Points
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
6327 Points (14%)
min: 3896     avg: 4314     median: 4137 (9%)     max: 4908 Points
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4281     avg: 4563     median: 4563 (23%)     max: 4845 Points
min: 2648     avg: 3058     median: 3261 (16%)     max: 3265 Points
min: 3410     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (17%)     max: 3557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4472     avg: 4689     median: 4689 (14%)     max: 4906 Points
min: 2723     avg: 3293     median: 3571 (11%)     max: 3584 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3361     median: 3360.5 (10%)     max: 3368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
1886 Points (1%)
min: 1620     avg: 1631     median: 1630.5 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
609 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29     avg: 30     median: 30 (2%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 21     avg: 24     median: 24 (3%)     max: 27 fps
20 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 44     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (1%)     max: 47 fps
min: 24     avg: 36     median: 42 (1%)     max: 42 fps
min: 30     avg: 33.8     median: 34 (1%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 66     median: 66 (4%)     max: 69 fps
min: 50     avg: 54.3     median: 51 (3%)     max: 62 fps
min: 47     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (3%)     max: 55 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP6
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 103     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (1%)     max: 112 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
min: 104     avg: 110     median: 105 (1%)     max: 121 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
83516 Points (10%)
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (13%)     max: 106975 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 41022     avg: 41847     median: 42183 (96%)     max: 42335 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 41901     avg: 43072     median: 43464 (97%)     max: 43852 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
34.9 fps (0%)
34.2 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 12491     avg: 22356     median: 22356 (22%)     max: 32221 Points
7552 Points (8%)
24573 Points (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4354     avg: 6862     median: 6861.5 (12%)     max: 9369 Points
2573 Points (5%)
22448 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
4.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 71% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 101% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP4:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 20 ~ 20 fps
150%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
120%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 118%

ARM Mali-G57 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2





2
1









ARM Mali-G57 MP6lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile2025
World of Tanks Blitz6060
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1
1



1
1
1









ARM Mali-G71 MP20lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 11:45:49

#0 checking url part for id 10451 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7732 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.126s ... 0.127s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.127s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.127s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10451 +0.037s ... 0.164s

#9 got single benchmarks 10451 +0.01s ... 0.174s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7732 +0.002s ... 0.175s

#11 got single benchmarks 7732 +0.009s ... 0.184s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.002s ... 0.186s

#13 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.017s ... 0.203s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.203s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.142s ... 0.345s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.345s

#17 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.355s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.355s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.358s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.374s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.374s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.376s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)