, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-400 MP vs ARM Mali-400 MP4

ARM Mali-400 MP

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-400 MP

The ARM Mali-400 MP is an OpenGL ES 2.0 capable graphics card for ARM based SoCs (System on a Chip). Therefore, the chip is intended to be used in tablets and smartphones. The graphics card can be scaled from one to four cores (so called fragment processors). Furthermore, it got one vertex processor and should perform slightly below a PowerVR SGX 543MP2 (most likely the top version).

ARM Mali-400 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-400 MP4

The ARM Mali-400 MP4 is an OpenGL ES 2.0 capable GPU for ARM SoCs (System on a Chip). It is primarily designed for tablets and smartphones with mobile operating systems like Android. MP4 is the version with four cores (so called fragment processors) and a vertex processor. According to ARM, the performance is slightly lower than a PowerVR SGX 543MP2 (probable with all four fragment processors).

ARM Mali-400 MPARM Mali-400 MP4
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-400 MP Series
Mali-400 MP4 4/1 cores
Mali-400 MP2 compare 2/1 cores
Mali-400 MP 1-4/1 cores
Mali-400 MP4 4/1 cores
Mali-400 MP2 compare 2/1 cores
Mali-400 MP 1-4/1 cores
ArchitectureUtgardUtgard
Pipelines1-4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Shared Memorynono
Date of Announcement02.06.2008 02.06.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPU in Mali-400 MPGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek MT83122 x 1300 MHz416 MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT65722 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 416 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-400 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK31884 x 1800 MHz600 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 3470 Quad4 x 1400 MHz450 MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz2 x 1500 MHz250 MHz? MHz
min. - max.250 - 600 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 1690     avg: 2311     median: 2404 (0%)     max: 2468 Points
min: 2340     avg: 2711     median: 2747 (0%)     max: 3047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 667     avg: 1321     median: 1500.5 (0%)     max: 1753 Points
min: 1911     avg: 2164     median: 2083.5 (0%)     max: 2470 Points
min: 1602     avg: 2628     median: 2681.5 (0%)     max: 3341 Points
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 7 fps
min: 8.4     avg: 12.3     median: 12 (2%)     max: 18 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 6.5     avg: 9.6     median: 8.7 (15%)     max: 17 fps
min: 9.7     avg: 12.7     median: 12 (20%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-400 MP
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 1.1     avg: 4     median: 4.2 (0%)     max: 7.8 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-400 MP4
min: 3.6     avg: 4.5     median: 4.1 (0%)     max: 6.6 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-400 MP
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 3.7     avg: 6.6     median: 6.1 (0%)     max: 9.6 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-400 MP4
min: 3.7     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (0%)     max: 9.4 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0
1981 Points (15%)
2139 Points (16%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 1030     avg: 1216     median: 1240 (43%)     max: 1355 Points
min: 1393     avg: 2055     median: 2101 (73%)     max: 2440 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 1838     avg: 2394     median: 2310 (20%)     max: 3600 Points
min: 2180     avg: 3533     median: 3383 (30%)     max: 4805 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 1638     avg: 2894     median: 2495 (26%)     max: 4814 Points
min: 2260     avg: 4302     median: 4392 (46%)     max: 6603 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 8.45     avg: 25.9     median: 22 (36%)     max: 56.27 fps
min: 11.96     avg: 36.8     median: 37.6 (62%)     max: 60.28 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 2.844     avg: 3.4     median: 3.2 (15%)     max: 4.196 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 1697     avg: 1728     median: 1719 (4%)     max: 1769 Points
min: 2538     avg: 2616     median: 2615.5 (6%)     max: 2693 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 4813     avg: 4961     median: 4956 (11%)     max: 5142 Points
min: 4925     avg: 6440     median: 6990 (16%)     max: 7405 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 21.6     avg: 44.2     median: 47.2 (70%)     max: 67.30000305175781 fps
min: 27.5     avg: 53.9     median: 56.4 (84%)     max: 63.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1704     avg: 2221     median: 2188 (2%)     max: 2587 Points
min: 2103     avg: 2586     median: 2609 (3%)     max: 2835 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 518     avg: 668     median: 704.5 (2%)     max: 733 Points
min: 738     avg: 855     median: 850 (2%)     max: 1143 Points
min: 912     avg: 1828     median: 1759 (38%)     max: 2829

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-400 MP → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-400 MP4 → 135% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 08:45:12

#0 checking url part for id 2821 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3337 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2821 +0.025s ... 0.069s

#8 got single benchmarks 2821 +0.031s ... 0.1s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3337 +0s ... 0.1s

#10 got single benchmarks 3337 +0.029s ... 0.129s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.149s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.149s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.177s

#15 return log +0.003s ... 0.18s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)