Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8735 vs Mediatek Helio A25

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

The Mediatek MT8735 is a mid range ARM based SoC for (mostly Android based) smartphones. It was manufactured in 28nm and offers a quad-core processor with four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.3 GHz. As a graphics card, the SoC integrates a ARM MAli-T720MP2. The integrated LTE radio supports CDMA2000 and a 5GHz 802.11bgn WiFi modem is also included.

Mediatek Helio A25

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio A25

The Mediatek Helio A25 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in early 2020. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores divided in two clusters. A performance cluster with 4 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz and a efficiency cluster clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE Cat.4 modem, a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

show full text
ModelMediatek MT8735Mediatek Helio A25
Series MediatekMediatek Mediatek Helio 20
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Helio 20 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1300 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
Features4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/BaidouUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUARM Mali-T720PowerVR GE8320 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio A25
0.3 pt (24%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -47%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -42%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -34%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -31%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -24%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -4%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 2%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 2%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 9%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 9%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 43%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 44%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4601 49%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 322%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
min: 11166     avg: 12236     median: 11236 (9%)     max: 14306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
min: 744     avg: 944     median: 858 (10%)     max: 1160 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
min: 795     avg: 970     median: 892 (10%)     max: 1165 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 124     avg: 135.5     median: 138.5 (6%)     max: 141 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 445     avg: 758     median: 860 (2%)     max: 867 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
597 Points (8%)
825 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1651 Points (4%)
3884 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
min: 12118     avg: 13475     median: 13475 (16%)     max: 14832 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
min: 3526     avg: 3780     median: 3779.5 (3%)     max: 4033 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 28605     avg: 29187     median: 29187 (24%)     max: 29769 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 16319     avg: 16528     median: 16528 (13%)     max: 16737 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 6930     avg: 9522     median: 9521.5 (2%)     max: 12113 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 38709     avg: 40307     median: 40306.5 (15%)     max: 41904 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 93758     avg: 95543     median: 95543 (9%)     max: 97328 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
99375 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
min: 4302     avg: 4871     median: 5027 (33%)     max: 5364 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
min: 6032     avg: 6704     median: 6426 (32%)     max: 7655 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
1383 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
3493 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A25 → 140% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 10:34:23

#0 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11933 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.02s ... 0.05s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11933 +0.016s ... 0.066s

#9 got single benchmarks 11933 +0.023s ... 0.089s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.093s ... 0.183s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.185s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.186s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.188s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.19s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.212s

#17 return log +0.033s ... 0.245s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)