Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8317T vs MediaTek MT8377 vs MediaTek MT6575

MediaTek MT8317T

► remove from comparison  MT8317T

The Mediatek MTK 8317T is an inexpensive SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. The SoC is both based on and recognized as the Mediatek MT6577, but with a slightly higher clock rate of 1.2 GHz. The CPU cores are based on the Cortex-A9 architecture and the chip includes a PowerVR SGX531 GPU.

MediaTek MT8377

► remove from comparison  MT8377

The MediaTek MT8377 is an SoC for budget Android tablets and smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and offers a dual-core Cortex-A9 processor at a typical 1 - 1.2 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU, a 3G/HSPA/Edge modem, 1080p video decoder, WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS and an FM radio.

MediaTek MT6575

► remove from comparison  MT6575

The MediaTek MT6575 is an ARM-based SoC for entry-level Android smartphones and tablets. It contains a single Cortex-A9 CPU at 1 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU and a 3G/HSPA radio.

ModelMediaTek MT8317TMediaTek MT8377MediaTek MT6575
Series Mediatek Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65771 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65771 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65771 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 21 / 1
iGPUPowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
Technology40 nm40 nm
Manufacturer Mediatek MT8377 Mediatek MT6575
Features3G, HSPA, PowerVR SGX 531 GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8317T +
3555 Points (2%)
50%
1 MT6575 +
1773 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 274     avg: 301     median: 301 (2%)     max: 328 Points
377 Points (3%)
315 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 620     avg: 723     median: 723 (7%)     max: 826 Points
785 Points (7%)
845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1218     avg: 1257     median: 1256.5 (2%)     max: 1295 Points
1446 Points (3%)
696 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 726     avg: 729     median: 728.5 (1%)     max: 731 Points
837 Points (2%)
396 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 833     avg: 869     median: 869 (2%)     max: 905 Points
993 Points (3%)
582 Points (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 37.33     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (2%)     max: 68.2 MFLOPS
67.7 MFLOPS (2%)
34.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 38.5     median: 38.5 (4%)     max: 39.28 MFLOPS
42.6 MFLOPS (4%)
31.6 MFLOPS (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8317T +
1347 ms (15%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1000     avg: 1198     median: 1197.5 (11%)     max: 1395 ms
1891 ms (18%)
1727 ms (16%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8317T +
min: 3060     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (7%)     max: 3244 points
96%
1 MT8377 +
3024 points (7%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 3201     avg: 3212     median: 3212 (21%)     max: 3223 Points
2993 Points (19%)
1220 Points (8%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8317T +
199 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8317T +
4404 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8317T +
4319 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8317T → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8377 → 111% n=9

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 → 75% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 06. 08:39:54

#0 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4139 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4195 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#16 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.011s

#21 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 4139 +0s ... 0.017s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#24 got single benchmarks 4139 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 4195 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#27 got single benchmarks 4195 +0.006s ... 0.029s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#71 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.041s

#72 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)