Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MediaTek MT8317T vs MediaTek MT6575

MediaTek MT8317T

► remove from comparison  MT8317T

The Mediatek MTK 8317T is an inexpensive SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. The SoC is both based on and recognized as the Mediatek MT6577, but with a slightly higher clock rate of 1.2 GHz. The CPU cores are based on the Cortex-A9 architecture and the chip includes a PowerVR SGX531 GPU.

MediaTek MT6575

► remove from comparison  MT6575

The MediaTek MT6575 is an ARM-based SoC for entry-level Android smartphones and tablets. It contains a single Cortex-A9 CPU at 1 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU and a 3G/HSPA radio.

ModelMediaTek MT8317TMediaTek MT6575
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8377 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8377 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
iGPUPowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Technology40 nm
Features3G, HSPA, PowerVR SGX 531 GPU
Manufacturer Mediatek MT6575

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
3555 Points (2%)
1773 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 274     avg: 301     median: 301 (2%)     max: 328 Points
315 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 620     avg: 723     median: 723 (7%)     max: 826 Points
845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1218     avg: 1257     median: 1256.5 (2%)     max: 1295 Points
696 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 726     avg: 729     median: 728.5 (1%)     max: 731 Points
396 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 833     avg: 869     median: 869 (2%)     max: 905 Points
582 Points (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 37.33     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (2%)     max: 68.2 MFLOPS
34.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 38.5     median: 38.5 (4%)     max: 39.28 MFLOPS
31.6 MFLOPS (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8317T +
1347 ms (15%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1000     avg: 1198     median: 1197.5 (11%)     max: 1395 ms
1727 ms (16%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8317T +
min: 3060     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (7%)     max: 3244 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 3201     avg: 3212     median: 3212 (21%)     max: 3223 Points
1220 Points (8%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8317T +
199 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8317T +
4404 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8317T +
4319 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8317T → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 → 73% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 15:40:54

#0 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4195 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.01s

#17 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 4195 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#20 got single benchmarks 4195 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.026s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.032s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.032s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#54 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.035s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.033s ... 0.068s

#56 return log +0.004s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)