Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8173 vs Mediatek MT8176

Mediatek MT8173

► remove from comparison  MT8173

The Mediatek MT8173 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC (System on a chip) that was introduced in March 2015 and is primarily used for Android based tablets. It is manufactured in a 28 nm process and has a total of four CPU cores with two Cortex-A72 and two Cortex-A53 cores in a big.LITTLE configuration. The graphics unit is based on the IMG Series 6XT (Rogue) and has the designation PowerVR GX6250. Among others, the GPU includes a video decoder with 4K and H.265 support.

Processor

The biggest highlight of the SoC are the new Cortex-A72 cores, which can be seen as the successors to the Cortex-A57 design. ARM promises much more performance in combination with reduced power consumption, which results in an excellent per-thread performance with the very high maximum clock of 2.4 GHz. The architecture is based on ARMv8-ISA and therefore supports 64-bit.

The two slower, but therefore very frugal Cortex-A53 cores (clocks unknown, probably around 1.5 GHz) are supposed to reduce the power consumption and are always active with light workloads. The big.LITTLE configuration also allows the simultaneous use of all four cores (or any combination of cores from both clusters), so the MT8173 can be called a real quad-core.

Graphics

The graphics unit is based on Series 6XT (Rogue) from IMG and has the designation PowerVR GX6250. The 2-cluster chip has a unified-shader architecture with a total of 64 FP32 ALUs as well as 4 TMUs. Thanks to the comparatively high maximum clock of 700 MHz, the performance is roughly on par with the PowerVR G6430 in the iPhone 5s. High-resolution screens and complex Android games from 2015 are usually no problem for the GPU.

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the chip is also equipped with an LPDDR3 memory controller (2x 32-bit, probably up to 933 MHz, 14.9 GB/s), but no wireless modem. The maximum display resolution is 2560 x 1600 pixels. Another highlight is the integrated video engine, which even supports 4K material and the modern H.265 codec.

Power Consumption

The MT8173 is manufactured in an 28 nm process and should have a average up to high power consumption. It can still be used in tablets without limitations.

Mediatek MT8176

► remove from comparison  MT8176

The Mediatek MT8176 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC (System on a chip) that was introduced in October 2016 and is primarily used for Android based tablets. It has two fast Cortex-A72 CPU cores running at up to 2.1 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores for power-saving in a big.LITTLE configuration. The graphics unit is based on the IMG Series 6XT (Rogue) and has the designation PowerVR GX6250 clocked at 600 MHz. Among others, the GPU includes a video decoder with 4K and H.265 support (not verified, but was already the case for the older MT8173).

Processor

The biggest highlight of the SoC are the new Cortex-A72 cores, which can be seen as the successors to the Cortex-A57 design. ARM promises much more performance in combination with reduced power consumption, which results in an excellent per-thread performance with the very high maximum clock of 2.4 GHz. The architecture is based on ARMv8-ISA and therefore supports 64-bit.

The four slower, but therefore very frugal Cortex-A53 cores (clocks unknown, probably around 1.4 GHz) are supposed to reduce the power consumption and are always active with light workloads. The big.LITTLE configuration also allows the simultaneous use of all six cores (or any combination of cores from both clusters), so the MT8173 can be called a real hexa-core.

Graphics

The graphics unit is based on Series 6XT (Rogue) from IMG and has the designation PowerVR GX6250. The 2-cluster chip has a unified-shader architecture with a total of 64 FP32 ALUs as well as 4 TMUs. Compared to the MT8173, the clocks were reduced from 700 to 600 MHz, so the gaming performance is a bit lower. High-resolution screens and complex Android games should be powered without bigger problems.

ModelMediatek MT8173Mediatek MT8176
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A72/-A53Cortex-A72/-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT81762.1 GHz6 / 6 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT8173 « 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT8173C compare2.1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT8176 « 2.1 GHz6 / 6 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT81732.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Mediatek MT8173C compare2.1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A72/-A53
Clock2400 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 46 / 6
Technology28 nm28 nm
Features20 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR GX6250 GPU20 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR GX6250 GPU
iGPUPowerVR GX6250 (? - 700 MHz)PowerVR GX6250 (600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
15117 Points (13%)
min: 9729     avg: 14723     median: 16449 (14%)     max: 17990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1386 Points (16%)
min: 650     avg: 1265     median: 1265 (15%)     max: 1880 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1399 Points (16%)
744 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1204 Points (12%)
min: 1541     avg: 1583     median: 1582.5 (16%)     max: 1624 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3305 Points (4%)
min: 2489     avg: 3233     median: 3232.5 (4%)     max: 3976 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8176 +
1592 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8176 +
3324 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8173 +
2909 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8173 +
1385 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3976 ms (5%)
min: 3001     avg: 3599     median: 3756 (4%)     max: 4041 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
8570 Points (8%)
min: 3596     avg: 7623     median: 8897 (8%)     max: 10377 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
63777 Points (22%)
min: 74177     avg: 76579     median: 76578.5 (26%)     max: 78980 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6544 Points (20%)
6354 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
22256 Points (27%)
32176 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
11012 Points (3%)
19714 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
37905 Points (23%)
49540 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
77717 Points (14%)
107784 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
1 MT8173 +
509 min (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2620 Points (14%)
2826 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
3656 Points (8%)
3235 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3678 Points (24%)
min: 4827     avg: 4924     median: 4923.5 (32%)     max: 5020 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4895 Points (24%)
min: 3898     avg: 6032     median: 5843 (29%)     max: 8356 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8173 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8176 → 114% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 06:20:12

#0 checking url part for id 6666 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8401 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6666 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#7 got single benchmarks 6666 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8401 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#9 got single benchmarks 8401 +0.014s ... 0.054s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.125s ... 0.178s

#12 return log +0.037s ... 0.215s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)