Mediatek MT8165 vs Mediatek MT6750

Mediatek MT8165

► remove MT8165

The MediaTek MT8165 is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC for Android devices launched in 2014. The quad-core processor is manufactured in 28 nm and based on the Cortex-A53 architecture. In addition to the CPU core, it integrates an ARM Mali-760 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR3 memory controller (32-bit, 800 MHz, 6.4 GB/s).

Processor

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit architecture (ARMv8 ISA) to address more than 4 GB of memory, the new design offers better branch prediction and higher performance-to-power ratio that rivals the Cortex-A9. The four cores of the MT8165 are clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and sits roughly in between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.7 GHz) and Snapdragon 410 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.2 to 1.4 GHz). The power-efficient processor is fit for common tasks like browsing and running light applications.

Graphics

The integrated dual-core Mali-T760 MP2 is a mid-range GPU clocked at up to 500 MHz. Most Android games will run at acceptable frame rates on medium resolutions and quality.

Mediatek MT6750

► remove MT6750

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750 SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor announced in Q2 2016 for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

The integrated GPU is the modern ARM Mali-T860 MP2 (two clusters) clocked at up to 520 MHz. It should be able to run all current Android games.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

Mediatek MT8165Mediatek MT6750
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 (compare)2600 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (compare)2300 - 2500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (compare)2300 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (compare)2300 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (compare)2000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (compare)2000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8752 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6752 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6753 (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6750S (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6750N (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT67501500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8732 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
» Mediatek MT81651500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6739 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6739WW (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6732 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8735 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6737T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6737 (compare)1250 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735P (compare)1000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735M (compare)1000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek Helio P25 (compare)2600 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (compare)2300 - 2500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 (compare)2300 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (compare)2300 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (compare)2000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (compare)2000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8752 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6752 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6753 (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6750S (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT6750N (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
» Mediatek MT67501500 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8732 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT81651500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6739 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6739WW (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6732 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8735 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6737T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6737 (compare)1250 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735P (compare)1000 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6735M (compare)1000 MHz4 / 4
1500 MHz1500 MHz
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
LPDDR3 Memory ControllerCat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP2 ( - 500 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2 ( - 530 MHz)
Mediatek MT8165 Mediatek MT6750

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
12248 Points (8%)
min: 9078     avg: 9342     median: 9341.5 (6%)     max: 9605 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
12365 Points (15%)
min: 8965     avg: 9227     median: 9227 (11%)     max: 9489 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 4811     avg: 9040     median: 9924 (11%)     max: 10553 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
min: 694     avg: 1093     median: 1108.5 (14%)     max: 1244 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
min: 703     avg: 1082     median: 1118 (22%)     max: 1256 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
2031 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
686 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1849 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
651 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 590     avg: 618     median: 612 (10%)     max: 682 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1790     avg: 2520     median: 2617 (5%)     max: 2765 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
17410 ms (29%)
min: 11708.2     avg: 14563     median: 13762.8 (23%)     max: 22626.8 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
1358 ms (15%)
2042 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
4116 Points (8%)
min: 1994     avg: 3095     median: 3200 (6%)     max: 3506 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
1145 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
1771 Points (39%)
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
2957 Points (39%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
12865 points (30%)
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
34331 Points (35%)
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
min: 38547     avg: 41781     median: 42181 (14%)     max: 44842 Points
AndEBench - Java
1066 Iter./s (33%)
AndEBench - Native
10481 Iter./s (34%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
59688 Points (8%)
min: 75193     avg: 75778     median: 75778 (10%)     max: 76363 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
4226 Points (22%)
min: 3667     avg: 4271     median: 4287 (22%)     max: 4532 Points
PCMark for Android - Computer Vision score
min: 1430     avg: 1580     median: 1568.5 (13%)     max: 1754 Points
PCMark for Android - Storage score
min: 2451     avg: 2933     median: 2917 (10%)     max: 3445 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
min: 2782     avg: 3221     median: 3254 (26%)     max: 3394 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8165 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750 → 98%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)