MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz vs Marvell Armada PXA1908

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8163 V/B is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-T720 MP2 graphics card clocked at 520 MHz, a DDR3x32 1600Mbps memory controller, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 b/g/n, GPS and FM are integrated in the SoC.

The similar named MediaTek MT8163 V/A is the faster version, with a CPU clock o up to 1.5 GHz and GPU of up to 600 MHz.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

Marvell Armada PXA1908

► remove from comparison

The Marvell Armada PXA1908 is an ARM based low end SoC for smartphones and tablets. The chip was announced in late 2014 and integrates four 64-Bit Cortex-A53 processor cores with up to 1.2 GHz. As a graphics card, the SoC integrates a Vivante GC7000UL. Furthermore, a LPDDR2/3 memory controller and a HSPA+/WCDMA/LTE Cat. 4 (max. 150 Mbit/s) radio is integrated. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and also suited for small smartphones. 

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHzMarvell Armada PXA1908
Mediatek Marvell Technology Group
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1300 MHz1200 MHz
4 / 44 / 4
28 28
DDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 [email protected], internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZoneVivante GC7000UL GPU, HSPA+/WCDMA/LTE Cat. 4, LPDDR2/3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)Vivante GC7000UL
ArchitectureARMARM
Marvell Technology Group Armada PXA1908

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
8944 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
8885 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8724     avg: 10042     median: 10290 (11%)     max: 10857 Points
9613 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 716     avg: 831     median: 867 (11%)     max: 875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 739     avg: 852     median: 870.5 (15%)     max: 893 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1888     avg: 1930     median: 1930 (3%)     max: 1972
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 617     avg: 638     median: 638 (13%)     max: 659
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1717 (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
575 (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
601 (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1583 (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (9%)     max: 648
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (3%)     max: 1797
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
226 MFLOPS (8%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
122 MFLOPS (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11817.6     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (22%)     max: 14320.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (5%)     max: 3320 Points
2059 Points (3%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
932 Points (25%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1231 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1871 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
8542 points (20%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
22432 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 34714     avg: 35625     median: 35464 (12%)     max: 36602 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
4493 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
13368 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
2432 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
20724 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
41017 Points (7%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
354 Iter./s (11%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
7829 Iter./s (26%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
10868 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4125     avg: 4345     median: 4294 (21%)     max: 4685 Points

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Marvell Armada PXA1908 → 83% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)