MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz vs MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz

► remove

The MediaTek MT8163 V/A is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-T720 MP2 graphics card clocked at 600 MHz, a DDR3x32 1600Mbps memory controller, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 b/g/n, GPS and FM are integrated in the SoC.

The similar named MediaTek MT8163 V/B is the slower clocked version, with a CPU clock o up to 1.3 GHz (-6%) and GPU of up to 520 MHz (-13%).

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

► remove

The MediaTek MT8163 V/B is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-T720 MP2 graphics card clocked at 520 MHz, a DDR3x32 1600Mbps memory controller, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 b/g/n, GPS and FM are integrated in the SoC.

The similar named MediaTek MT8163 V/A is the faster version, with a CPU clock o up to 1.5 GHz and GPU of up to 600 MHz.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHzMediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2200 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8168 compare2000 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1200 MHz8 / 8
» MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1500 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1300 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8161 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2200 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8168 compare2000 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1200 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1500 MHz4 / 4
» MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1300 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8161 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
1500 MHz1300 MHz
4 / 44 / 4
28 28
DDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 [email protected], internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZoneDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 [email protected], internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (600 MHz)ARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8790     avg: 10063     median: 9926 (11%)     max: 11472 Points
min: 8724     avg: 10042     median: 10290 (12%)     max: 10857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
776 Points (10%)
min: 716     avg: 831     median: 867 (11%)     max: 875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 768     avg: 831     median: 781 (14%)     max: 945 Points
min: 739     avg: 852     median: 870.5 (15%)     max: 893 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1+ 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 549     avg: 636     median: 636 (9%)     max: 723
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (10%)     max: 648
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1+ 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (3%)     max: 2009
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (3%)     max: 1797
Geekbench 5 - Geekbench 5 64 Bit Single-Core
134 (9%)
134 (9%)
Geekbench 5 - Geekbench 5 64 Bit Multi-Core
375 (2%)
375 (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12549.8     avg: 14060     median: 14060.4 (24%)     max: 15571 ms
min: 11817.6     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (22%)     max: 14320.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2972     avg: 3261     median: 3261 (5%)     max: 3550 Points
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (5%)     max: 3320 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 33452     avg: 37816     median: 37815.5 (13%)     max: 42179 Points
min: 34714     avg: 35625     median: 35464 (12%)     max: 36602 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4042     avg: 4277     median: 4276.5 (13%)     max: 4511 Points
4493 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 13724     avg: 15979     median: 15979 (20%)     max: 18234 Points
13368 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 2431     avg: 2672     median: 2671.5 (1%)     max: 2912 Points
2432 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 19354     avg: 21013     median: 21013 (13%)     max: 22672 Points
20724 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 39551     avg: 43893     median: 43892.5 (8%)     max: 48234 Points
41017 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2133 Points (11%)
2133 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1923 Points (7%)
1923 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3071     avg: 3328     median: 3424 (22%)     max: 3489 Points
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4576 Points (23%)
min: 4125     avg: 4345     median: 4294 (21%)     max: 4685 Points

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 98% n=19

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)