, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Mediatek MT6750N vs Mediatek MT8735

Mediatek MT6750N

► remove from comparison  MT6750N

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750N SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. Compared to the older MT6750, the graphics card seems to be clocked higher.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison  MT8735

The Mediatek MT8735 is a mid range ARM based SoC for (mostly Android based) smartphones. It was manufactured in 28nm and offers a quad-core processor with four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.3 GHz. As a graphics card, the SoC integrates a ARM MAli-T720MP2. The integrated LTE radio supports CDMA2000 and a 5GHz 802.11bgn WiFi modem is also included.

Mediatek MT6750NMediatek MT8735
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1500 MHz1300 MHz
8 / 84 / 4
28 28
Cat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-T860 MP2ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT6750N Mediatek MT8735

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10044 Points (10%)
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (11%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1031 Points (13%)
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (11%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1013 Points (15%)
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (12%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
597 (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
1651 (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
665 (8%)
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (8%)     max: 647
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2645 (3%)
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
14116 ms (24%)
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199.3 (22%)     max: 13705 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3274 Points (5%)
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (4%)     max: 3312 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
43987 Points (15%)
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750N +
1699 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6750N +
2820 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3138 Points (21%)
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3885 Points (19%)
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750N → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 89% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 11:55:39

#0 checking url part for id 10096 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10096 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 10096 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.01s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.028s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.031s

#17 return log +0.004s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)