Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6739WW vs Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795

Mediatek MT6739WW

► remove from comparison  MT6739WW

The MediaTek MT6739WW is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC launched in 2017 primarily for small budget Android devices. The quad-core processor is based on the Cortex-A53 architecture and clocks up to 1.5 GHz. It integrates an LTE modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL) and a PowerVR GE8100 at 570 MHz (the predecessors used ARM Mali GPUs). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi adapter and a video de- and encoder in hardware.

The difference to the normal Mediatek MT6739 (see for more benchmarks) is not known and specs and performance are identical.

Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795

► remove from comparison  MT6795

The Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2015. It is manufactured in a 28 nm CMOS process and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores. The 8 cores are divided in two clusters with 4 cores each. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to LPDDR3-933. Furthermore an LTE Modem (Cat 4) is integrated in the SoC.

The chip also integrates a PowerVR G6200 graphics card clocked at 700 MHz.

ModelMediatek MT6739WWMediatek Helio X10 MT6795
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Clock1500 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm28 nm
Features4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPUUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, TD-SCDMA, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPU
iGPUPowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)PowerVR G6200 (? - 700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer Mediatek MT6739WW Mediatek MT6795

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10230 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
655 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
669 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
589 Points (7%)
789 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1718 Points (2%)
2041 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
614 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1681 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1525 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
549 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
653 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1791 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1355 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1788 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16008 ms (19%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3213 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3565 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
14593 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
3084 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
22448 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
43690 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
49040 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2260 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1839 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4408 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739WW → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 → 126% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 14:56:57

#0 checking url part for id 11387 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6467 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#28 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 11387 +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.073s ... 0.08s

#32 got single benchmarks 11387 +0.008s ... 0.088s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 6467 +0s ... 0.089s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#36 got single benchmarks 6467 +0.007s ... 0.097s

#37 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#65 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.106s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#67 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.106s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.131s

#69 return log +0.004s ... 0.135s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)