, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Mediatek MT6737T vs Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

Mediatek MT6737T

► remove from comparison  MT6737T

The MediaTek MT6737T is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC announced in 2016 primarily designed for smartphones (mainly Android devices). It is manufactured in a 28 nm process and consists of four CPU cores based on the 64-bit Cortex-A53 architecture clocked at up to 1.5 GHz (MT6737 up to 1.35 GHz). The GPU is an ARM Mali-720 MP2. It integrates a Cat.4 LTE modem with CDMA2000 as well as a video de- and encoder for 1080p30 videos (H.264 and H.265).

Processor

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit architecture (ARMv8 ISA) to address more than 4 GB of memory, the new design offers better branch prediction and higher performance-to-power ratio that rivals the Cortex-A9. The four cores of the MT6737 are clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and are roughly on par with the Snapdragon 410 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.2 to 1.4 GHz). The processor is fit for common tasks like browsing and running light applications.

Graphics

The integrated single-core Mali-T720 is an entry-level GPU clocked between 550-650 MHz for the MT6737 (or 600 for the MT6737T). Most Android games will play at acceptable frame rates on low or medium resolutions and quality.

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the MT6737T SoC also integrates a memory controller (1x LPDDR2/3 733 MHz), multiple radios (WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS), and a cellular modem (GSM, UMTS, GPRS, HSPA+, HSUPA, TD-SCDMA, EVDO, and LTE Cat 4). Its integrated video engine allows for 1080p playback at 30 FPS. Cameras are supported up to 13 MP.

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

The Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 is a mid-range ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets that was available starting in Q3 2015. The octa-core processor includes eight 64 Bit Cortex-A53 cores clocked with up to 2 GHz. Furthermore a ARM Mali-T860 MP2 graphics card with up to 700 MHz and a LTE Cat. 6 modem is integrated.

The performance of the CPU cores si similar to the Kirin 930 and therefore in the mid-range of smartphone SoCs in 2015 and 2016.

The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 28nm (HPC+) and also suited for smartphones (e.g. the Elephone P9000).

Mediatek MT6737TMediatek Helio P10 MT6755
MediatekMediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1500 MHz2000 MHz
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
Rel. 9, Cat. 4 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A, EDGE, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 13MP image signal-processor,UMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, TD-SCDMA, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2 (700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT6737T +
min: 9251     avg: 9889     median: 9888.5 (6%)     max: 10526 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9155     avg: 9839     median: 9838.5 (10%)     max: 10522 Points
min: 11200     avg: 11251     median: 11250.5 (12%)     max: 11301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 7424     avg: 10350     median: 10755 (11%)     max: 11393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 824     avg: 947     median: 969 (12%)     max: 984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 767     avg: 897     median: 919.5 (13%)     max: 988 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
795 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4696 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2696 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3064 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3370 (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
880 (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 620     avg: 627     median: 626 (10%)     max: 634
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1390     avg: 1612     median: 1684 (4%)     max: 1761
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 648     avg: 668     median: 672 (8%)     max: 682
min: 616     avg: 721     median: 720.5 (9%)     max: 825
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1807     avg: 1869     median: 1876.5 (2%)     max: 1932
min: 2628     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (4%)     max: 3225
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10544     avg: 12142     median: 12434.9 (21%)     max: 13300 ms
min: 9346     avg: 11346     median: 9772 (16%)     max: 23913.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1861 ms (20%)
1107 ms (12%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2684     avg: 3200     median: 3266 (5%)     max: 3483 Points
min: 3163     avg: 3867     median: 3964.5 (6%)     max: 4395 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (9%)
31 Points (10%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1044 Points (28%)
min: 1248     avg: 1274     median: 1273.5 (34%)     max: 1299 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1575 Points (35%)
min: 1999     avg: 2190     median: 2189.5 (49%)     max: 2380 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
2524 Points (33%)
min: 2975     avg: 3187     median: 3187 (42%)     max: 3399 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
22647 points (52%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 35747     avg: 38233     median: 38372 (13%)     max: 40981 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 3408     avg: 4433     median: 4603 (14%)     max: 5117 Points
4446 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 13570     avg: 14637     median: 14561.5 (18%)     max: 15853 Points
14401 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 2634     avg: 2695     median: 2710 (1%)     max: 2724 Points
11466 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 21781     avg: 21973     median: 21901.5 (13%)     max: 22308 Points
24506 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 41484     avg: 43737     median: 44135 (8%)     max: 45193 Points
54819 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
2040 Points (0%)
min: 89748     avg: 102617     median: 102616 (14%)     max: 115485 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2760 Points (7%)
min: 2305     avg: 2787     median: 2786.5 (7%)     max: 3268 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2249     avg: 3163     median: 3245 (21%)     max: 3487 Points
min: 3278     avg: 3344     median: 3350 (22%)     max: 3405 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2759     avg: 4041     median: 4285 (21%)     max: 4607 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 1631     avg: 1783     median: 1782.5 (9%)     max: 1934 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6737T → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 → 328% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 20:27:44

#0 checking url part for id 8500 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8061 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8500 +0s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 8500 +0.017s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8061 +0s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 8061 +0.022s ... 0.051s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.088s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)