Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6589T vs Mediatek MT6592

Mediatek MT6589T

► remove from comparison  MT6589T

The Mediatek MT6589T is a low-end system-on-a-chip (SoC) found in many inexpensive smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and integrates a Cortex-A7-based quad-core CPU clocked at 1.5 GHz, a PowerVR SGX544 GPU clocked at 357 MHz, dual SIM and UMTS/HSPA+ support (up to 21 Mbps) and 1080p30 video decoding and encoding.

Both the CPU and GPU offer performances similar to an Nvidia Tegra 3 or the Samsung Exynos 4412 and Mali-400 GPU. Performance-per-clock of the Cortex-A7 is only slightly below that of a Cortex-A9, which can be found in the two aforementioned rivals. The graphics unit offers sufficient power for multimedia tasks and simple games, but not for extremely high resolution displays or complex 3D graphics.

Thanks to the modern 28 nm manufacturing and comparatively low performance, the power consumption of the entire chip is likely very low in order to be compatible with smaller smartphones and battery capacities.

Mediatek MT6592

► remove from comparison  MT6592

The MediaTek MT6592 is a mid-range 28 nm SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It was announced near the end of 2013 and is manufactured in 28 nm. It includes 8 Cortex-A7 processor cores that are typically clocked up to 1.7 - 2.0 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an ARM Mali-450 GPU at 700 MHz, WLAN, a video decoder for up to 4K content, a LPDDR3 memory controller at 666 MHz, and a 2G/3G (UMTS/HSPA+) radio.

Although the MT6592 offers eight relatively high clocked CPU cores compared to other SoCs, its performance in day-to-day usage is a bit lower, as the Cortex-A7 cores offer slower performance per clock and only a few apps are able to make use of all 8 cores simultaneously. Modern dual-core (e.g., Apple A7) or quad-core (e.g., Cortex A15 or Snapdragon 800) SoCs can be clearly faster in everyday scenarios.

The integrated ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU offers 4 graphics clusters that are clocked at a high 700 MHz. However, the performance of the GPU is somewhat below that of a Tegra 4 or Adreno 320. Also like the Nvidia rival, the Mali-450 lacks support for OpenGL ES 3.0.

ModelMediatek MT6589TMediatek MT6592
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65921.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT6572 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6592 « 1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT6572 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A7
Clock1500 MHz1700 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, 533 MHz LPDDR2, 13 MP Camera ISP, 1080p30 encode/decode, PowerVR SGX544 @ 357 MHzUMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, WiFi (802.11n), 666 MHz LPDDR3, 16 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, GPS, NFC, ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 MHz
iGPUPowerVR SGX544 (357 MHz)ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 5508     avg: 8551     median: 9246 (8%)     max: 10060 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 5182     avg: 9113     median: 9762 (8%)     max: 10293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 5713     avg: 10577     median: 11158 (9%)     max: 12604 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1344     avg: 2350     median: 2390 (4%)     max: 2847 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 262     avg: 438.1     median: 445 (9%)     max: 526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1922     avg: 2135     median: 2134.5 (3%)     max: 2347 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 357     avg: 398     median: 398 (6%)     max: 439 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 MT6592 +
430 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 MT6592 +
966 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 MT6592 +
4185 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 MT6592 +
2458 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
2561 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 242     avg: 295.4     median: 292.9 (10%)     max: 350 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 118.6     avg: 144.2     median: 143.9 (14%)     max: 171 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 11338     avg: 14383     median: 14278 (17%)     max: 19205 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 904     avg: 1338     median: 1182 (13%)     max: 2016 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1396     avg: 1617     median: 1616.5 (15%)     max: 1837 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1895     avg: 2511     median: 2563.5 (2%)     max: 3085 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 696     avg: 796     median: 817 (22%)     max: 853 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1254     avg: 1456     median: 1503.5 (33%)     max: 1562 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 871     avg: 1559     median: 1694 (22%)     max: 1977 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 11433     avg: 13992     median: 14485 (34%)     max: 16058 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 25761     avg: 27891     median: 27979 (65%)     max: 30358 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 22774     avg: 28587     median: 29100 (29%)     max: 33176 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 329     avg: 386.3     median: 384.5 (12%)     max: 447 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 11657     avg: 16616     median: 17876 (59%)     max: 19055 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 13907     avg: 22989     median: 25313.5 (3%)     max: 26698 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 2991     avg: 3194     median: 3193.5 (16%)     max: 3396 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6592 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 16:19:07

#0 checking url part for id 5358 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5482 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5358 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 5358 +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5482 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 5482 +0.024s ... 0.056s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.136s

#12 return log +0.04s ... 0.176s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)