Mediatek MT6589T vs Mediatek MT6592

Mediatek MT6589T

► remove MT6589T

The Mediatek MT6589T is a low-end system-on-a-chip (SoC) found in many inexpensive smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and integrates a Cortex-A7-based quad-core CPU clocked at 1.5 GHz, a PowerVR SGX544 GPU clocked at 357 MHz, dual SIM and UMTS/HSPA+ support (up to 21 Mbps) and 1080p30 video decoding and encoding.

Both the CPU and GPU offer performances similar to an Nvidia Tegra 3 or the Samsung Exynos 4412 and Mali-400 GPU. Performance-per-clock of the Cortex-A7 is only slightly below that of a Cortex-A9, which can be found in the two aforementioned rivals. The graphics unit offers sufficient power for multimedia tasks and simple games, but not for extremely high resolution displays or complex 3D graphics.

Thanks to the modern 28 nm manufacturing and comparatively low performance, the power consumption of the entire chip is likely very low in order to be compatible with smaller smartphones and battery capacities.

Mediatek MT6592

► remove MT6592

The MediaTek MT6592 is a mid-range 28 nm SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It was announced near the end of 2013 and is manufactured in 28 nm. It includes 8 Cortex-A7 processor cores that are typically clocked up to 1.7 - 2.0 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an ARM Mali-450 GPU at 700 MHz, WLAN, a video decoder for up to 4K content, a LPDDR3 memory controller at 666 MHz, and a 2G/3G (UMTS/HSPA+) radio.

Although the MT6592 offers eight relatively high clocked CPU cores compared to other SoCs, its performance in day-to-day usage is a bit lower, as the Cortex-A7 cores offer slower performance per clock and only a few apps are able to make use of all 8 cores simultaneously. Modern dual-core (e.g., Apple A7) or quad-core (e.g., Cortex A15 or Snapdragon 800) SoCs can be clearly faster in everyday scenarios.

The integrated ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU offers 4 graphics clusters that are clocked at a high 700 MHz. However, the performance of the GPU is somewhat below that of a Tegra 4 or Adreno 320. Also like the Nvidia rival, the Mali-450 lacks support for OpenGL ES 3.0.

Mediatek MT6589TMediatek MT6592
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 compare1500 MHz4 / 4
» Mediatek MT6589T1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 compare1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8125 compare1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
» Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 compare1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589T1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 compare1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8125 compare1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
1500 MHz1700 - 2000 MHz
256 KB512 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
UMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, 533 MHz LPDDR2, 13 MP Camera ISP, 1080p30 encode/decode, PowerVR SGX544 @ 357 MHzUMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, WiFi (802.11n), 666 MHz LPDDR3, 16 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, GPS, NFC, ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 MHz
iGPUPowerVR SGX544 (357 MHz)ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz)
Mediatek MT6589T Mediatek MT6592

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 5508     avg: 8551     median: 9246 (6%)     max: 10060 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 5182     avg: 9113     median: 9762 (12%)     max: 10293 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 5713     avg: 10577     median: 11158 (13%)     max: 12604 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
430 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
966 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
4185 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
2458 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2561 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1344     avg: 2350     median: 2390 (4%)     max: 2847 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 262     avg: 438     median: 445 (9%)     max: 526 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1922     avg: 2135     median: 2134.5 (3%)     max: 2347 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 357     avg: 398     median: 398 (8%)     max: 439 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 241.989     avg: 295     median: 292.8 (10%)     max: 350 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 118.576     avg: 144     median: 143.9 (14%)     max: 171 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 11338.2     avg: 14383     median: 14278 (24%)     max: 19204.8 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 904.2     avg: 1338     median: 1182 (13%)     max: 2016 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1396.2     avg: 1617     median: 1616.8 (15%)     max: 1837.4 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 1895     avg: 2511     median: 2563.5 (5%)     max: 3085 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
min: 696     avg: 796     median: 817 (22%)     max: 853 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
min: 1254     avg: 1456     median: 1503.5 (33%)     max: 1562 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
min: 871     avg: 1559     median: 1694 (22%)     max: 1977 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
min: 11433     avg: 13992     median: 14485 (34%)     max: 16058 points
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
min: 25761     avg: 27891     median: 27979 (65%)     max: 30358
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 22774     avg: 28587     median: 29100 (29%)     max: 33176 Points
AndEBench - Java
min: 329     avg: 386     median: 384.5 (12%)     max: 447 Iter./s
AndEBench - Native
min: 11657     avg: 16616     median: 17876 (59%)     max: 19055 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
min: 13907     avg: 22989     median: 25313.5 (3%)     max: 26698 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
min: 2991     avg: 3194     median: 3193.5 (16%)     max: 3396 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6592 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.12
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)