Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8377

MediaTek MT6575

► remove from comparison MT6575

The MediaTek MT6575 is an ARM-based SoC for entry-level Android smartphones and tablets. It contains a single Cortex-A9 CPU at 1 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU and a 3G/HSPA radio.

MediaTek MT8377

► remove from comparison MT8377

The MediaTek MT8377 is an SoC for budget Android tablets and smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and offers a dual-core Cortex-A9 processor at a typical 1 - 1.2 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU, a 3G/HSPA/Edge modem, 1080p video decoder, WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS and an FM radio.

show full text
ModelMediaTek MT6575MediaTek MT8377
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
Technology40 nm40 nm
Features3G, HSPA, PowerVR SGX 531 GPU
iGPUPowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer Mediatek MT6575 Mediatek MT8377
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT6575 +
1773 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
315 Points (3%)
377 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
845 Points (8%)
785 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
696 Points (1%)
1446 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
396 Points (1%)
837 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
582 Points (2%)
993 Points (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
34.8 MFLOPS (1%)
67.7 MFLOPS (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
31.6 MFLOPS (3%)
42.6 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1727 ms (16%)
1891 ms (18%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8377 +
3024 points (7%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
1220 Points (8%)
2993 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8377 → 164% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 16:24:59

#0 checking url part for id 4195 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4139 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 4195 +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#17 got single benchmarks 4195 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 4139 +0s ... 0.015s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#20 got single benchmarks 4139 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#41 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.026s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#43 return log +0.004s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)