, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MediaTek MT6572 vs Mediatek MT8125

MediaTek MT6572

► remove from comparison  MT6572

The dual-core Mediatek MT6572 is an entry-level ARM SoC found in a number of Android smartphones and tablets. It contains two Cortex-A7 CPU cores and an ARM Mali-400 graphics card. The CPU cores are typically clocked at 1.2 GHz and the GPU core at 500 MHz. Furthermore, an LPDDR2 memory controller, a 2G/3G (HSPA+) radio, 720p video decoder, WLAN, Bluetooth and GPS modules are integrated onto the chip. 

Performance

As the Cortex A7 architecture is slightly slower per clock than the older Cortex-A9 or Krait cores, the CPU performance is approximately on the same level as a Samsung Exynos 4210 or similar. The ARM Mali-400 GPU is only an entry-level graphics card unsuited for demanding Android 3D games.

Power Consumption

Due to the power-efficient Cortex-A7 cores and the 28 nm manufacturing process, the power consumption of the Mediatek MT6572 is low enough to be used in smaller smartphones.

Mediatek MT8125

► remove from comparison  MT8125

The Mediatek MT8125 is a low-cost ARM SoC (System on a Chip) mainly used in tablets. It is manufactured in 28 nm and integrates a quad-core Cortex-A7 processor and a PowerVR SGX 544 GPU. The CPU cores are typically clocked at 1.2 - 1.5 GHz while the GPU is clocked at 300 MHz.

Performance

Since the Cortex-A7 architecture is somewhat slower than a Krait or Cortex-A9 design at the same clock speeds, the performance of the MT8125 is just below Nvidia's Tegra 3 or the Samsung Exynos 4412. The PowerVR SGX 544 is also just a low-cost solution not designed for ultra-high resolution displays or very demanding games.

Features

In addition to the processor and GPU, the SoC integrates a decoder for 1080p video, WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio, GPS and 2G/3G radios up to HSPA+. Cameras are supported up to a resolution of 13 MP.

Power consumption

Thanks to the energy-efficient A7 cores and 28 nm manufacturing, the power consumption is likely very low and suitable for even smaller tablets.

MediaTek MT6572Mediatek MT8125
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6592 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT81251.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» MediaTek MT65721.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6592 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» Mediatek MT81251.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT65721.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
1200 MHz1200 - 1500 MHz
128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 24 / 4
28 28
HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, Wi-Fi, FM, Bluetooth, GPS, LPDDR2 Memory ControllerWi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS, FM, 3G/HSPA+, 2G/EDGE
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPPowerVR SGX544 (300 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT8125

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 2946     avg: 3647     median: 3765 (2%)     max: 4134 Points
min: 6958     avg: 7559     median: 7622 (5%)     max: 8034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 2937     avg: 3692     median: 4000 (4%)     max: 4138 Points
min: 7828     avg: 8086     median: 8066 (9%)     max: 8383 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
4320 Points (4%)
min: 7990     avg: 8125     median: 8080 (8%)     max: 8306 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
247 Points (2%)
min: 264     avg: 270     median: 271 (2%)     max: 273 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
628 Points (6%)
min: 743     avg: 806     median: 822.5 (7%)     max: 834 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
840 Points (2%)
min: 2007     avg: 2020     median: 2019.5 (4%)     max: 2035 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
487 Points (1%)
min: 1194     avg: 1208     median: 1204 (2%)     max: 1229 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
614 Points (2%)
min: 1309     avg: 1319     median: 1315.5 (3%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 473     avg: 550     median: 575 (1%)     max: 586
min: 1077     avg: 1171     median: 1110 (2%)     max: 1386
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 254     avg: 304     median: 314 (6%)     max: 325
min: 324     avg: 347     median: 325.5 (7%)     max: 414
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 73.461     avg: 104     median: 88.4 (3%)     max: 149.395 MFLOPS
min: 89.585     avg: 103     median: 89.7 (3%)     max: 127.104 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 45.961     avg: 70.2     median: 59.3 (6%)     max: 105.318 MFLOPS
min: 33.777     avg: 36.3     median: 37.6 (4%)     max: 38.403 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18280     avg: 21475     median: 21474.8 (36%)     max: 24669.6 ms
min: 16900     avg: 19560     median: 17694.2 (30%)     max: 25949.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1430.1     avg: 1679     median: 1722.8 (19%)     max: 1840.6 ms
min: 864.1     avg: 1269     median: 1341.5 (15%)     max: 1529.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1769 ms (17%)
min: 1111.4     avg: 1292     median: 1303.3 (12%)     max: 1449.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1317     avg: 1588     median: 1587.5 (2%)     max: 1858 Points
1915 Points (3%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
595 Points (16%)
583 Points (16%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
644 Points (14%)
1155 Points (26%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1326 Points (18%)
min: 1386     avg: 1472     median: 1471.5 (19%)     max: 1557 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
2894 points (7%)
min: 3953     avg: 4394     median: 4393.5 (10%)     max: 4834 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 MT8125 +
5925 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 9434     avg: 10647     median: 10919 (25%)     max: 11317 Points
min: 13211     avg: 13244     median: 13243.5 (31%)     max: 13276 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
12567 Points (13%)
15649 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8125 +
14200 Points (5%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
144 Iter./s (4%)
min: 304     avg: 324     median: 330 (10%)     max: 332 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
2600 Iter./s (9%)
min: 6449     avg: 6502     median: 6506.5 (21%)     max: 6544 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 2924     avg: 3680     median: 3679.5 (0%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 8230     avg: 8406     median: 8406 (1%)     max: 8580 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
1077 Points (5%)
1873 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6572 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8125 → 158% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 10:49:19

#0 checking url part for id 4742 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4456 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4742 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 4742 +0.01s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4456 +0s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 4456 +0.009s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.048s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)